Raytheon

  www.raytheon.com
  www.raytheon.com

Raytheon Reviews

Updated December 11, 2014
Updated December 11, 2014
1,538 Reviews
3.4
1,538 Reviews
Rating Trends

Recommend to a friend
Approve of CEO
Raytheon Chairman and CEO William H. Swanson
William H. Swanson
717 Ratings

Review Highlights

Pros
  • Work-life balance is excellent for such a large accounting organization (in 180 reviews)

  • Time-off: 9/80 schedule allows for 9 hour workdays and every other Friday off (in 133 reviews)


Cons
  • In my experience didn't value work/ life balance (in 38 reviews)

  • Upper management often doesn't recognize how it is different from manufacturing (in 44 reviews)

More Highlights

116 Employee Reviews Back to all reviews

Sort: Popular Rating Date
  1. 2 people found this helpful  

    Politics and Back-Stabbing

    • Comp & Benefits
    • Work/Life Balance
    • Senior Management
    • Culture & Values
    • Career Opportunities
    Former Employee - Software Engineer in El Segundo, CA
    Former Employee - Software Engineer in El Segundo, CA

    I worked at Raytheon full-time (more than 10 years)

    Pros

    The pay and benefits are good, even though they're continually being cut back as companies race to the bottom. That's the only reason I stayed for so long, even though for years I dreaded getting out of bed on weekday mornings.

    Cons

    The environment encourages managers to devote themselves to political turf battles, in which employees are mere pawns. No promotion from within, either; when an opening exists they always bring in someone from outside who knows nothing.

    Advice to ManagementAdvice

    It's pointless to offer any advice to upper management. They have no need to listen to anyone, as they know everything.

    Doesn't Recommend
    Neutral Outlook
  2. 1 person found this helpful  

    The ABSOLUTE worst experience of my long and productive 50 year career!!!

    • Comp & Benefits
    • Work/Life Balance
    • Senior Management
    • Culture & Values
    • Career Opportunities
    Current Employee - Anonymous Employee
    Current Employee - Anonymous Employee

    I have been working at Raytheon

    Pros

    Uhh..they DO pay you..but not enough for the horrid treatment. Sure, get recruited straight out of school, lots of perks...if you can't find anything else. IMHO, do NOT plan on staying more than 2 years...use it as a start, but have a move-on plan, or I guarantee you will regret it.

    Cons

    Management..stupid arrogant mindless management following a quagmire of rules they barely understand and rarely agree with, and that seem to change every hour. Leadership...well, there IS no leadership...only mindless management robots administering management that they do not fully understand and are completely unable to communicate to the workforce.

    Advice to ManagementAdvice

    Go find maybe one leader?? Not likely, but the upper managers are golden parachute rich, and get personal expenses paid (I have seen the records).

    Doesn't Recommend
    Neutral Outlook
    Disapproves of CEO
  3.  

    Wish it wasn't so!

    Current Employee - Anonymous Employee
    Current Employee - Anonymous Employee

    I have been working at Raytheon

    Pros

    plenty of Jobs, they tell you, you can move around, but they make it hard.

    Cons

    No direction in RMS in Alabama

    Advice to ManagementAdvice

    Mgmt needs to communicate with each other and get on the same page!

  4. Is this helpful? The community relies on everyone sharing – Add Anonymous Review


  5.  

    Shabby pay, shabbier office

    • Comp & Benefits
    • Work/Life Balance
    • Senior Management
    • Culture & Values
    • Career Opportunities
    Former Employee - Anonymous Employee in Troy, MI
    Former Employee - Anonymous Employee in Troy, MI

    I worked at Raytheon full-time (more than 8 years)

    Pros

    The good attribute to the Troy office of Raytheon is the flex time, but even with that you are made to feel like a slacker because you utilize it. Good benefits.

    Cons

    Extremely low morale, NO I REPEAT, NO opportunity for advancement unless you are in the right clique, and if you are anything other than white (or a light-skinned Mexican passing for white), you can REALLY forget it! The pay is WAY below scale.

    Advice to ManagementAdvice

    Managers: you all look miserable & unhappy! Seek therapy and add diversity of thought & cultures, don't just check the box.

    Doesn't Recommend
    Negative Outlook
    No opinion of CEO
  6. 1 person found this helpful  

    Unethical and Low Expectations

    • Comp & Benefits
    • Work/Life Balance
    • Senior Management
    • Culture & Values
    • Career Opportunities
    Current Employee - Senior Systems Engineer II in El Segundo, CA
    Current Employee - Senior Systems Engineer II in El Segundo, CA

    I have been working at Raytheon full-time (less than an year)

    Pros

    The individual contributors are mostly great to work with like any standard company. The benefits are average.

    Cons

    Salary - They will totally low ball you and say they have no cost of living built into there salary ranges. This isn't true. Every company has some sort of compensation for different regions.

    Work - The expectations are low. This is not good IMHO due to the types of contracts being worked on - people's lives are at stake! The process approaches are stuck in the 80's.

    Management - Needs a overhaul! My manager says very inappropriate things and attempts to divide the teams.

    Advice to ManagementAdvice

    Do some weeding and don't put people who shouldn't be in leadership positions in them.

    Doesn't Recommend
    Neutral Outlook
    No opinion of CEO
  7.  

    Great mission, poor environment.

    • Comp & Benefits
    • Work/Life Balance
    • Senior Management
    • Culture & Values
    • Career Opportunities
    Former Employee - Manager III in Tucson, AZ
    Former Employee - Manager III in Tucson, AZ

    I worked at Raytheon full-time (more than 8 years)

    Pros

    Very interesting/technical work and mission. Supporting the warfighter in this current world environment can be very gratifying and their products get the job done.

    Cons

    Leadership and work environment less than professional. Bottom line focus at all costs including staff careers - high performance means nothing. Not a "career" focused company.

    Advice to ManagementAdvice

    You have the makings of a great company but need to get your priorities on track and do something about it. In particular a focus on your greatest asset, your staff. Your leadership at many levels lack professionalism and basic skills.

    Doesn't Recommend
    Positive Outlook
    No opinion of CEO
  8.  

    Raytheon not for software design professionals

    • Comp & Benefits
    • Work/Life Balance
    • Senior Management
    • Culture & Values
    • Career Opportunities
    Current Employee - Engineer
    Current Employee - Engineer

    I have been working at Raytheon full-time (more than 10 years)

    Pros

    A hard engineering degree, and a high school level of coding ability.

    <filler filler filler filler filler filler filler filler>

    Cons

    Raytheon is generations behind in its software design.

    <filler filler filler filler filler filler filler filler filler filler filler filler>

    Advice to ManagementAdvice

    With the hundreds of thousands of lines of software code that I reviewed at your company, you are incapable of writing modular software. Most engineering code that you are describing as "reusable" and "world class" is not even modular, using a professional definition. You are a software company, but deny that you are. Most of the engineering simulations that you use are filled with global variables, fractured functionality, and a lack of logical coherence. Much of the code is not professionally documented. You consider that the best programmer is a hard engineer who knows the syntax of a computer language -- that is the 1970 definition of a "data processor", or the current definition of an IT guy -- not a skilled programmer.

    Your culture assimilates the rhetoric of software design, without professional definitions of terminology. By doing this, you have destroyed any possibility for a professional discourse on technical software design. Your culture that accepts that "engineers make the best <fill in the blank> promotes a culture of technical amateurism, in which any engineer who reads a book on a subject (such as software design) can claim to be an SME in that field. Your software SMEs reflect only about 1980 software design ability. This is an amateur standard.

    You have not assimilated the last 35 years of Computer Science, and the thousands of canonical algorithms that it has described and studied. What is easily reachable, your chief engineers and scientists think is science fiction. What is computationally infeasible, you still pursue and fund in R&D. Your R&D primes put out algorithms at an alarming rate that are computationally infeasible, (because they have not assimilated undergraduate Computer Science theory), and they are not held accountable for these design failures that could be detected on paper. You cannot afford to through away 70-80% of your algorithm IRAD budget on these foreseeable failures, or give these approaches status in your culture.

    Your company culture treats software design as unskilled secretarial work, overseen by middle managers who could never pass an undergraduate course in Computer Science. You must change your culture, and your middle managers. Your middle managers deny the software problem, use empty rhetoric to cover it up, and continually hire hard engineers to do software design who have no technical training in software algorithm design (making the problem worse). Those doing software work are blamed for the design failures of the middle managers who created the software. There is no fair court of appeals. You will never attract professional and theoretical software designers, with your current culture, and its lack of accountability.

    Although you have computers on every desk, and computer labs down every hall, you are not automated and do not have the software design theory to know what can be automated, or how to do it. This makes your company horrendously unproductive compared to technical design companies who have assimilated modern software design theory, and leveraged it into automation. (Prima facia evidence for this is the late date at detecting algorithm failures after software coding, and the inability to produce multi-program simulations to quickly and accurately assess capability for new contracts.)

    You will continue to lose new contracts because of the state of your current engineering software, and the lack of professional SMEs in advanced software design. Your lack of agility (despite your rhetoric) and your inability to quickly deliver fast and accurate simulations, will be noticed. You are generations behind in software design, and the associated productivity of automation. Hiring 23 year old EE degrees to "fix" the software, will only create the appearance of a solution.

    The problem is first of all a cultural one. Hard engineering at the academy is the same as Raytheon culture. You are using business analytics to merely reflect your current cultural values (and rankings), and lay off (or not hire) the software design professionals that you desperately need. Most of the software written by engineers is at CMMI level 0: it is not even modular or functionally orthogonal. Until you are willing to assimilate professional design standards for software, and use them to professionally identify the scope and degree of your software problems, you will not have any usable to tool to address the reshaping of your culture.

    Doesn't Recommend
  9. 1 person found this helpful  

    Don't look behind the curtain.

    • Comp & Benefits
    • Work/Life Balance
    • Senior Management
    • Culture & Values
    • Career Opportunities
    Former Employee - Senior Systems Engineer II in Wilmington, MA
    Former Employee - Senior Systems Engineer II in Wilmington, MA

    I worked at Raytheon full-time (more than an year)

    Pros

    Raytheon has great benefits, awesome cafeteria, extensive fitness center and beautiful buildings. The employees are generally nice if you find the right clique, otherwise, not so much. Because they are a military contractor, there is an almost overwhelming emphasis on ethical behavior, as if those of us already with ethics need this continually pounded into our brains. As with any professional engineering organization, there is a reasonable level of work hour flexibility.

    Cons

    If you have any rough edges, you will most certainly NOT fit into this company. They WILL round off any of that over time. They also use people, and when they're done with you, it's layoff time. Projects come and go, and so do vast numbers of people.
    There is no chance to move around the company because of entrenched special interests and the 'need to know'. In the defense industry, because of the classified nature of things, this is called the Silo Effect.
    When people feel threatened by any attempt to learn from them, you're completely shut out from any further knowledge acquisition. Many long-term employees are so damn busy, they have no time, nor inclination, to share their special unwritten undocumented knowledge, especially if they feel threatened in any way by your ability to understand their 'special knowledge'.
    Working in the top secret/classified environment is so chaotic and dynamic that most people in the same group have cubes no where near each other (many times on different floors!), making collaborative work virtually impossible. And they wonder why projects are perpetually and disastrously late. If you work in a secret/classified area, no cellphones, etc. at your desk and limited outside internet access.
    Project Managers are required to do actual detailed engineering in addition to their managerial tasks, thus causing poor results for both.
    Documentation is touted as being exceedingly important. However, the reality is that it's disjoint, difficult to find, of exceedingly poor quality, and almost never kept up-to-date. And don't bother using their intranet 'search' to find any corporate documentation of any value because they subscribe to the 'search everything' philosophy regardless of where it's stored, how long it's been on the servers, or its relevance to real employees. Press releases are considered just as important to the search engine as human resource policies, making the search results utterly useless.
    The company tries to get people 'involved' with things (blogs, discussion forums, etc.) that have absolutely nothing to do with the work at hand. This is a gigantic waste of time and resources. Do not fall for this because your work will suffer while you gain nothing from these interactions with other employees.
    There are special 'innovators' who present what they believe to be state-of-the-art managerial innovations that turn out to be processes and organizational structures that smaller companies have been using FOR DECADES! And they're so very proud of themselves for 'discovering' them. I had to open a few windows to let the massive bloviation out.
    This is another company that continues to drink the Six Sigma cool aid. This failed management tool has been debunked for more than two decades, and yet they're still riding that broken horse into the sunset. There are literally hundreds of Six Sigma Masters (or some such ego-driven moniker) who tout their ability to "drive innovation" throughout the company. My experience with these people was that they had their collective heads so far up their rears, that they truly thought they were seeing daylight! Astonishing how deluded they were concerning their actual ability to accomplish real work. But the company continues to push this useless and overblown management tool, tying promotions to the employees' continual movement up the Six Sigma ladder.
    Astonishingly microscopic cubicles.
    Too much noise to effectively concentrate on my work. Most people use their 'outside voice' for indoor personal conversations. This is a direct failure of managers to create an atmosphere of respect for fellow employees. These conversations should be moved to designated meeting rooms so the rest of us can concentrate on the difficult and detailed work at hand.
    There are two different groups of IT staff, normal and classified. Both of them treat their 'customers' like crap because they're outsourced! Many companies are doing this to the great detriment of their actual employees because the outsourced people have no connection to the company and it's employees whom they serve.

    Advice to ManagementAdvice

    Stop marketing the company to the employees. They're already there! They don't need to be continually convinced about how 'wonderful' it is to work there. There is no work-life balance. Either do the work or be shown the door. I saw that all too often.
    Give managers appropriate management tools and the time to use them. Give managers enough people to do the work so that managers don't have to back-fill tasks themselves that their underlings should have been doing all along.

    Doesn't Recommend
    Disapproves of CEO
  10. 1 person found this helpful  

    Overall pompous attitudes and stressful, disparaging atmosphere

    • Comp & Benefits
    • Work/Life Balance
    • Senior Management
    • Culture & Values
    • Career Opportunities
    Former Employee - Anonymous Employee
    Former Employee - Anonymous Employee

    I worked at Raytheon full-time

    Pros

    Some great, congenial co-workers.

    Great health insurance.

    Some good managers.

    Cons

    Terrible department management. They say new employees have a six-month learning curve, but they get angry at you after a few weeks if you ask questions.

    Some very pompous attitudes. Rewards based not on performance, but how much brown-nosing you can accomplish.

    Diminishing benefits.

    Very high-stress environment. This is causing health problems for many employees, but managers don't like when you have to take time off to go to the doctor's office.

    Women paid less than men in the same positions.

    Advice to ManagementAdvice

    Don't promote people into management positions just because they've been there for a certain period of time. Promote based on a combination of experience and ability to manage, handle stress, and social aptitude.

    Pay attention to why your department has a very high turnover rate. It's not them, it's you. Recognize the holes in your leadership philosophy and amend them.

    Doesn't Recommend
    Negative Outlook
    Disapproves of CEO
  11. 4 people found this helpful  

    Signing your life away for little pay

    • Comp & Benefits
    • Work/Life Balance
    • Senior Management
    • Culture & Values
    • Career Opportunities
    Current Employee - Technician in Forest, MS
    Current Employee - Technician in Forest, MS

    I have been working at Raytheon full-time (more than an year)

    Pros

    If you are someone who cant find a job any where else and you have a passive aggressive mentality that keeps you from standing up for yourself. IF YOU STILL WISH TO WORK HERE AFTER READING THIS I AM SORRY FOR YOU.

    Cons

    where to start......how about everything low pay almost minimum wage, bad leadership, not focused on personal well fare of employees, supervisors pick sides, people legitimitely hate working here and will remind you constantly, low morale, people fall asleep at the job, management is quick to fire you, and did I mention the low pay. All you will ever hear is get your 40 hours but if you add travel back and forth its really close to 50 hours.

    Advice to ManagementAdvice

    Hire people who actually now how to lead and supervise, stop picking sides, stick to the company equal oppertunity policies, give employees the chance to be promoted, stop lying about getting days off, work harder at the beginning of the month rather than rush at the end and raise the amount that you pay your employees.

    Doesn't Recommend
    Negative Outlook
    Disapproves of CEO

Work at Raytheon? Share Your Experiences

Raytheon

 
Click to Rate
or

Your response will be removed from the review – this cannot be undone.