Dimagi

  www.dimagi.com
  www.dimagi.com

Dimagi Jobs & Careers

Hiring? Post a Job

Show:  All Results Last 7 Days
30+ days ago

Communications Program Analyst

Dimagi Cambridge, MA

Dimagi is looking for a program analyst for our growing communications work. Working with the rest of the communications team, the program analyst… Glassdoor


6 days ago

Project Manager

Dimagi, Inc Delhi

Skill: Project Manager,Planning,organizational; Exp: 4-7 years; We are looking for adventurous individuals who are eager to work with a diverse team… Glassdoor


6 days ago

Partnerships Associate

Dimagi, Inc Delhi

Skill: Partnerships Associates,Project Associates,mobile phone applications; Exp: 2-7 years; Dimagi is looking for a Partnerships Associate to… Glassdoor


Dimagi Reviews

7 Reviews
4.7
7 Reviews
Rating Trends

Recommend to a friend
Approve of CEO
(no image)
Jonathan Jackson
7 Ratings
  1.  

    Cult of mediocrity

    • Comp & Benefits
    • Work/Life Balance
    • Senior Management
    • Culture & Values
    • Career Opportunities
    Former Employee - Software Engineer in Cambridge, MA
    Former Employee - Software Engineer in Cambridge, MA

    I worked at Dimagi full-time (more than an year)

    Pros

    Good work-life balance.

    Flextime and very flexible on remote working.

    Developers can go on group trips to a developing country 1-2 times a year.

    Casual, open-office work environment full of friendly, mostly 20-something co-workers who socialize outside of work a lot. Occasional company retreats.

    All of the code you write is open source on Github.

    Relatively interesting work that isn't obviously making the world a worse place.

    Cons

    Dimagi is closer to a soulless government contractor than a humanitarian tech company. It's kind of a sick joke.

    If I could, I should've quit early on when I witnessed the CEO laugh at an employee for saying she had values.

    They constantly talk about impact, but it really just means power and feeding the narcissism of an inner circle of talentless hacks, many of whom were in the CEO's frat at MIT.

    They're basically a non-profit. They want to skim a cut off the top of their grant funding, not actually develop profit sources. How could they, when most of the people they're supposed to be helping probably would only buy their product let alone services if you paid them to, and the people who actually pay them don't seem to care enough about results to incentivize an environment that isn't shockingly dysfunctional.

    It's a bureaucracy. As many people as possible are involved in everything decision. One-size-fits-all processes are imposed from above. Extra-hierarchical organization or communication is rare. If you question your orders you're told you're wasting everyone's time. People just want to do their jobs with zero critical thinking.

    Everyone publicly fills out weekly timesheets broken down by issue tracker issue, and you will literally get yelled at if you spent a couple hours on something off-task.

    Vast, mind-numbing inefficiencies are not only tolerated but aggressively defended. Impact is used to justify continuously doing the lowest-quality acceptable job, but this quickly cripples the product and makes everything take way longer. Management is hostile to even the most basic precepts of software development professionalism.

    There are no incentives to be productive. If you get your work done faster, they'll just give you more work.

    They have 10 "personal initiative days" (a recent decrease from 10% time, which hardly anyone used) that are "often [used to] address a pain point somewhere in our process." In other words, management doesn't want you using your judgment to address pain points normally, and uses the existence of this policy to yell at you if you do.

    It's not a bad company to work at if you can see it for what it is and act in a self-interested manner, but don't expect to be more than a cog in a machine, to work hard and be rewarded for it, or to be able to take pride in your work other than for the impact you're told it has.

    Advice to ManagementAdvice

    Make timesheets private, don't require detailed time-tracking for non-client-billable time.

    CEO should stop being involved in technical decisions, find a new CTO if the CTO can't handle that responsibility.

    Allow employees who've proven themselves to have a little bit of autonomy.

    Disapproves of CEO

Work at Dimagi? Share Your Experiences

Dimagi

 
Click to Rate
or