“I would go back anytime”

Pros:  “I have learned a lot from Amazon. There is a lot of innovation there and I could image to go back any time.”

Cons:  “There is one thing that I did not like at all. It is the performance reviews process and specially the calibration that was done by some people that had no idea of…” – Full Review

“Chevron is a good company.”

Pros:  “It is a very big company with large amount of opportunities to advance and try new thing. Benefits are really good. The 401 K match is second to none. There is also pension…”

Cons:  “I thing Chevron can improve on technical development of facilities engineers. In general company would benefit from accountability and team work between different…” – Full Review

“The best employer”

Pros:  “Bechtel cares its employees like family members”

Cons:  “I never felt any thing bad about bechtel” – Full Review

“A government contractor to avoid...”

Pros:  “They provide employment if you really need a job. If you like to travel, you will - about 50% of the time. However, be prepared to front the travel expenses and wait a…”

Cons:  “Company leaders are unprofessional, uneducated, and totally unskilled in employee management. The employee benefits are laughable- in three years, the company has…” – Full Review

“Work is steady and challenging but working in a bubble is a struggle”

Pros:  “Steady work that is interesting and challenging with long term schedules. Co-workers become your family and will support the mission's successes. Fair pay.”

Cons:  “Isolated from modern day technologies complicate the progresses and delay deliveries. Group think is prevalent aka 1984. Make one misstep and everyone will be…” – Full Review

“Good place to work. Pay is ok, but there are great benefits”

Pros:  “They offer good benefits like retirement matching and a lot of vacation time. There is good work/life balance and an emphasis on wellness for employees.”

Cons:  “The pay is probably not as high as commercial labs. The culture also seems a bit sluggish at times and there is less willingness to accept new, more efficient…” – Full Review