Valve Corporation

www.valvesoftware.com
Profile Unclaimed

Valve Corporation Reviews

11 Reviews
4.2
11 Reviews
Rating Trends

Recommend to a friend
Approve of CEO
(no image)
Gabe Newell
8 Ratings
  • 13 people found this helpful  

    Challenging, chaotic, interesting, surprisingly similar to other great companies

    • Comp & Benefits
    • Work/Life Balance
    • Senior Management
    • Culture & Values
    • Career Opportunities
    Former Employee - Engineer in Bellevue, WA
    Former Employee - Engineer in Bellevue, WA

    I worked at Valve Corporation full-time (more than a year)

    Pros

    Valve offers extremely generous benefits and perqs, and affords employees high levels of trust to do whatever they need to be productive. It is a privilege to work with the folks at Valve because nearly all are exceptionally accomplished, competent and eager to build something great. The environment really encourages employees to be positive and to focus on work that will directly impact the customer. Productivity is rewarded in part by peer review which makes employees accountable to their team. Changing teams/projects is usually easy, and is usually each employee's own decision. Employee autonomy is inherent in Valve's process.

    Cons

    Many of the ways in which Valve seeks to differentiate from other companies are not actually so valid. While it's true that Valve has no official job titles or promotions, compensation varies greatly among employees and many teams have an obvious pecking order. There is no formal management structure, but it's clear that some people have substantially more control over project direction and the work of others. Even though productivity is said to be the only metric that matters, people who are already connected or are accomplished social engineers will do just fine. Denying that all of these social forces are at work makes the problem intractable and difficult to even discuss.

    For a company that makes so much money, Valve is surprisingly risk-averse. New projects, internal tools, dev infrastructure, and anything that doesn't contribute to a current product are met with disdain. Because teams are intended to be self-forming, it's rare that enough people will want to assume risk to all collectively embark on a new project. It's too safe and too profitable to just contribute to something that's already successful. Even though failure is supposed to be tolerated and even encouraged so that employees will try new ideas and experiments, there is little evidence of this. After a few rounds of bonuses, folks learn quickly what is rewarded, and what is not.

    Valve's success has made folks arrogant, and this contributes to the problem of how new ideas are considered and discussed. Dogmatic thinking is actually common because people can always point to a great success in the past and use this to justify why everything should continue as it is. Some folks at Valve do not want the company to grow. Valve already has an incredibly strong profit/employee ratio. Why dilute it? This line of thinking crops up in project discussions as well, and causes many ideas to be dismissed because they seem too niche/unprofitable (at the time).

    Advice to ManagementAdvice

    I think that funding separate companies would be the best way for Valve to invest in new/different product areas. Identify capable teams who already work together and let them make their own rules and set their own goals.

    Be more honest about management structure. It will go a long way toward helping people make better decisions and will create more trust among employees.

    Recommends
    Positive Outlook
    Disapproves of CEO

Valve Corporation Interviews

Updated Feb 22, 2015
Updated Feb 22, 2015

Interview Experience

Interview Experience

23%
7%
69%

Getting an Interview

Getting an Interview

61%
23%
15%

Interview Difficulty

2.8
Average

Interview Difficulty

Hard

Average

Easy
  1.  

    No Role Specified Interview

    Anonymous Employee
    Anonymous Employee
    Application Details

    I applied online. The process took 2 weeksinterviewed at Valve Corporation.

    Interview Details

    I posted my resume in their career site and was hoping for any opportunities in Sales. I was contacted by their recruiting team and was asked to take an exam through email, It was just a phone interview and it lasted for an hour. Most of the questions were about online games and if I had any strategies to suggest for their sales team. I was accommodated with respect and the interviewers were very kind.

    Interview Questions
    No Offer
    Positive Experience
    Average Interview

Valve Corporation Awards & Accolades

Let us know if we're missing any workplace or industry recognition – Add an award

Additional Info

Unlock Profile
Website www.valvesoftware.com
Headquarters Bellevue, WA
Size 150 to 499 Employees
Founded Unknown
Type Company - Private
Industry Media
Revenue $100 to $500 million (USD) per year

Valve Corporation keeps gamers moving full Steam ahead. Along with creating video games for consoles and portable devices from Nintendo, Microsoft, and Sony, as well as for the PC, Valve also runs the industry-leading online game distribution, management, and social platform Steam. Popular Valve titles such as Half-Life, Portal, and Left 4 Dead are available on Steam, as well as games from publishers such as Electronic Arts and Ubisoft. Valve also licenses its Source game engine to game developers and others, and it provides gaming content to a network of cybercafes in... More

Work at Valve Corporation? Share Your Experiences

Valve Corporation

 
Click to Rate
or