A.T. Kearney Reviews
Updated Jan 31, 2012 – Reviews are posted anonymously by employees.
|
Company Rating Based on 79 ratings Employees say it's "OK" |
CEO Rating
Based on 51 ratings
Chairman and Managing Officer |
See who your friends know who've worked at A.T. Kearney and could give you an inside look.
See who your friends know who've worked at A.T. Kearney and could help you prep for an interview.
| 1–10 of 79 A.T. Kearney Reviews | Sort by |
Pros
Opportunity, experience, travel, personal growth
Cons
Long hours but rewarded for hard work
Pros
- Down to earth, smart people that are willing to learn and teach
- Partners are very approachable, not many 'Type A' high strung folks
- Client relationships are valued and folks are exposed to clients from day 1
Cons
- Long hours and poor work life balance (though the firm has started to make efforts to improve this)
- A more varied selection of projects- not just sourcing/supply chain/cost reduction and being more strategic in choosing work
Advice to Senior Management
Senior management should work on initiatives to grow the firm, scale is beginning to be an impediment especially when competing against MBB. Firm should also do more when reconnecting with alumni!
Pros
Growing quickly, down to earth, entrepreneur
Cons
reputation not as strong as some other competitors
Advice to Senior Management
Build brand and reputation
Pros
Global organization, global clients, reputation for outstanding work in supply chain
Cons
Low respect for people's working hours and worklife balance.
High turnover, little probability for promotion
Advice to Senior Management
Care more for AT Kearney people
Pros
Smart, ambitious, and exuberant individuals that are interested in their work and an appetite for leaning. Well known reputation has been the strong suit in the area of supply chain and operations consulting, however, culture is divided between Management Consulting side (80%) vs. Procurement Services (20%) with major salary differences and us vs. them attitude by many from Ivy League schools who know a whole lot of theory but short on experience.
Cons
For a company that had a solid foundation in supply chain, the focus has changed to general business consulting (hello Accenture, Deloitte, etc.) and lost focus on the core strength to further develop it as the industry leader. The division of the Management Consulting and Procurement Services creates friction and unnecessary inferior complex when consultants are working together on a project. Work Life balance does not exist and your career concerns are swept under the rug.
Over stresses importance of PowerPoint slides and overzealous Principals who have no principles when it comes to work/life balance with others ready to throw you under the bus at any moment.
Advice to Senior Management
Get your freaking crap together! Throwing people under the is never a good business model and the Directors/Principals who do nothing are enablers and should be part of the blame.
Pros
Great variety of projects in different industries, smart people, early responsibility
Cons
Operational focus, not much strategy work, small clients
Advice to Senior Management
Keep on developing the Nordic base
Pros
Excellent communication throughout global team
Cons
Too willing to pursue down-market opportunities
Pros
Intellectually stimulating, Professionalism, Great work life balance programs, Diverse group of employees, Growing and Evolving constantly, structured performance evaluation process.
Cons
Can improve people process and enhance brand image.
Pros
Good work environment and convenient location of office
Cons
No concept of work from home
Advice to Senior Management
More team interactions would help
Pros
- Being able to work with very smart people
- Level of autonomy and access to high level management
- Friendly teamworking
Cons
- Poor leadership and HR
- Lack of projects critical mass
- High number of working hours
- Lack of communication between management and staff
Advice to Senior Management
In order to keep the team, the leadership should start communicating better and putting the team above politics and internal issues between partners
