Baker Hughes Reviews
Updated May 31, 2012 – Reviews are posted anonymously by employees.
|
www.bakerhughes.com
Company Rating Based on 215 ratings Employees say it's “OK” |
CEO Rating
Based on 17 ratings
President and CEO |
Baker Hughes has 9,827 connections on Glassdoor
| 41–50 of 215 Baker Hughes Reviews | Sort by |
Pros
Good employees are there, despite change in "atmosphere"
Cons
Management took a downward spin
Advice to Senior Management
Don't forget about the staff. Don't forget the core principles. Don't forget to appreciate everyone.
Pros
flexible work environment - family friendly
Cons
slow to catch up with industry trends in Corporate aspects
Advice to Senior Management
Change is good
Pros
BHI develops states-of-art downhole technology and tools.
Cons
Slow to catch up with major competitors
Advice to Senior Management
Keep talented people
Pros
- Great pay
-Great experience
- Great people
Cons
Long hours
Felt like a fish in a big sea.
Advice to Senior Management
Keep up the good work
Pros
BH is very famous company.It has alot of services in the petroleum field. Engineers work there are very profissional.
Cons
hard work to achieve our goals
Advice to Senior Management
no offer or advice
Pros
Better pay compared to other servicing companies. Flexibility, knowledge acquisition and sharing etc
Cons
HR needs to be a little more organised
Advice to Senior Management
Pls stick with ur core values: SITPL
Pros
Relative freedom to define job and responsibilities, some interesting technical challenges. Good pension plan, ok medical and dental benefits. One of the big three oilfield service companies, so mobility and career possibilities are not bad.
Cons
Dysfunctional organization structure within the IT organization makes it very difficult to get anything done, and it requires a very large effort to get things moving. IT management's leadership style is autocratic. Some of the processes are archaic.
Advice to Senior Management
There is a plethora of tools, but little in the way of knowledge or training for using them properly. Reduce the number of tools, and get the best ones implemented properly. The HR tools for appraisals and job requisitions are the worst I have seen. The 3 IT groups involved in every project step on each other's toes, and hinder rather than help.
Pros
Benefits/salary and company "well known" name
Cons
Not everyone is treated fairly due to politics, needs to have a hard nose coming in.
Advice to Senior Management
Employee quarterly review and the 2010 Employee/upper management open hierarchy communication needs to be look upon again
Pros
(+) Wide array of service portfolio from upstream to downstream. Opportunities to endeavor other product line is feasible, retaining talents within the organization.
(+) Interaction with management and client
(+) Product line based training
Cons
(-) Job (mis)match is 'adversely affected by economics', so they speak. In their current talent acquisition system for fresh graduates (e.g. LEAD), some talents might not be channeled towards product lines that where they can fully harness their background.
(-) Assigned career managers might not be able to monitor progress of their talents in the program (e.g. LEAD).
Advice to Senior Management
The system is beautifully crafted, a system that drew me into the organization when it was made known to me. Use it, optimize it.
Pros
respect for employees and their needs
Cons
There is a lot of internal politics
Advice to Senior Management
There is a system in place for employee performance review, pls use them!



