California ISO Reviews in Sacramento, CA Area
Updated Feb 9, 2012 – Reviews are posted anonymously by employees. Ratings are reflective of location and job title.
|
Local Company Rating Based on 8 ratings Employees say it's "OK" |
Local
CEO Rating
Based on 4 ratings
President and CEO |
See who your friends know who've worked at California ISO and could give you an inside look.
See who your friends know who've worked at California ISO and could help you prep for an interview.
| 1–8 of 8 California ISO Reviews | Sort by |
Pros
One of the better places to work in the power systems field. Good pay, good location, nice people to work with.
Cons
Job may become boring sometimes, especially once you learn what you are supposed to do. Does not offer job rotations as some utilities do.
Pros
Great opportunity to work on cutting edge issues with many seasoned professionals in large team environment.
Cons
Management style and quality can sometimes vary considerably, a major factor in the work quality experience.
Advice to Senior Management
Reconsider the rigorous boot camp style training for new managers and instead focus on constructive team and group discussion approach.
Pros
- The culture is laidback and friendly
- A lot of opportunity to learn for a pro-active person
- The "feel-good" factor of contributing to something that matters
Cons
- A not-for-profit, hence (sometimes) things don't happen as quickly as you would want.
- Not very attractive for young employees
Advice to Senior Management
Hire younger folks too! Create some opportunities for younger people to get involved beyond interns (who mostly don't come back and are hence not a well-thought investment)
Pros
Nice working environment and most of the staff are reasonable to work with.
Cons
The senior management have no idea how to achieve their goals, and due to the indemic fear culture pervading the organization, the staff are unwilling to step up and provide honest input, and this has led to a very dysfunctional organization.
Advice to Senior Management
Hire a good Quality VP from outside the industry, and empower him/her to radically overall the company culture by encouraging professional input and feedback, good and bad, so that the organization can develop out of the stagnant state that it has fallen into.
Pros
Exciting work to be involved with
Cons
work culture is not very fast paced
Pros
CAISO is committed to managing energy trading for the State. The business is important to prevent the ENRON issues that occurred in the late 90's. The work site is nice, there is good security and facilities. CAISO is a quasi-state of California business deriving their funding from charging back fees to energy Producers and Purchasers as well as floating hundreds of millions of dollars in bonds to support MRTU and operating expenses.. There appears to be adequate funding and the employee medical/dental/401k and Senior Management bonuses are very generous.
Cons
CAISO has been trying to launch the upgraded MRTU program for at least 6 years and until 2009 all attempts have been unsucessfull. At least $300,000,000.00 was spent on this effort. Senior Management of ISO has recently stabilized but they are not empowered. All decisions are controlled by the CFO/CIO/VP. Poor Management at the top of the CAISO tree has caused poor morale and a virtual revolving door of employee and consultant turnover. Employees are in fear of upper management as they shoot the messenger. CASIO has been fined or assessed liquidated damages by governing agencies and the resistance to improve still exists.
Advice to Senior Management
Be honest and tell the truth. Covering up projects that have gone awry needs to be discontinued. Failures should be used a training tools as be best learn by our mistakes. Politics are common in the workplace but at the CAISO it is about perception and not actual performance.
Pros
Excellent company benefits
Pleasant geographical location
A larger proportion of the business staff and management are good to excellent
Cons
Sorely underutilize highly experienced and highly qualified technology staff
Advice to Senior Management
Need vastly improved practices in technology staff hiring and retention practices.
Pros
Flat organization allows for lateral advancement. The compensation package is pretty good, although from what I'm told, not as good as SMUD's. They are pretty flexible in terms of time off. At least 4 people have had children and were able to take time off (paternity leave?) The boss doesn't watch the clock every minute; exercise that takes a little more than an hour isn't even noticed!
Cons
Flat organization leaves little room for advancement. Most engineers are good at sharing information, but there are a few that are left from the reorganization of May 2003.
Advice to Senior Management
Use internal employees to get MRTU started on time. Contractors seem to keep pushing the go-live date back.
