Clickability Reviews

Updated March 12, 2015
4 reviews filtered by
  • Any Location
  • Any Job Title
  • Any Status
Employment Status

Reset
3.0
Recommend to a friend
Approve of CEO
(no image)
Jeff Freund
0 Ratings

Employee Reviews

Sort: Popular Rating Date
  1. Great place to work!

    • Work/Life Balance
    • Culture & Values
    • Career Opportunities
    • Comp & Benefits
    • Senior Management
    Former Employee - Anonymous Employee
    Former Employee - Anonymous Employee
    Recommends
    No opinion of CEO

    I worked at Clickability full-time (Less than a year)

    Pros

    Office culture was pretty remarkable.

    Cons

    young leadership team but eager to excel


  2. Painful

    • Work/Life Balance
    • Culture & Values
    • Career Opportunities
    • Comp & Benefits
    • Senior Management
    Current Employee - Technical Project Manager in San Francisco, CA
    Current Employee - Technical Project Manager in San Francisco, CA
    Doesn't Recommend
    Neutral Outlook
    No opinion of CEO

    I have been working at Clickability full-time (Less than a year)

    Pros

    I had an amazing manager: smart, communicative, transparent. A couple of the executive team members were of the highest caliber, demonstrating integrity and transparency. In the years since I worked there, Clickability seems to have learned from past mistakes and improved the sales strategy and delivery tactics.

    Cons

    In 2009, the executive leadership, while appearing cohesive on the surface, was actually quite divided as to acceptable tactics for achieving business objectives. A portion of the sales team worked to sign new business, seemingly unconcerned with whether or not the technology customization and/or delivery timelines required by incoming clients was achievable. The outcome of the divisive leadership was a workload that far exceeded the resources available, compromising our team welfare, our work quality, and client satisfaction.

    Advice to Management

    Identify the unique strengths of your technology and continue to enhance it. Target clients that will benefit most from these unique strengths.


  3. Great potential, but imperfect execution and poor communications with employees

    • Work/Life Balance
    • Career Opportunities
    • Comp & Benefits
    • Senior Management
    Current Employee - Anonymous Employee in San Francisco, CA
    Current Employee - Anonymous Employee in San Francisco, CA
    Doesn't Recommend
    Disapproves of CEO

    Pros

    Great location All in all, a good team of people Senior management is very approachable and mostly very supportive Competitive benefits

    Cons

    Inconsistent management at various levels in the company Fairly young and inexperienced team Overconvidence led them to overhire in 2008, forcing them to downsize significantly in 2009 Lack of structure and organization Too many meetings Lack communications from senior management about the state of the company - employees pushed to exhaustion to complete major projects on evenings and weekends then laid off without warning as soon as project was complete

    Advice to Management

    Focus on core product development and employee morale Focus on smart growth Provide clear and realistic targets for employees Provide more hands on management and structure Empower people to be sucessful, leverage their strengths and reward them for sucess Don't keep your employees in the dark about critical issues affecting their professional and personals lives


  4. Is this helpful? The community relies on everyone sharing – Add Anonymous Review


  5. Good people but not visionary at the senior management level

    • Work/Life Balance
    • Career Opportunities
    • Comp & Benefits
    • Senior Management
    Current Employee - Senior Quality Engineer in San Francisco, CA
    Current Employee - Senior Quality Engineer in San Francisco, CA
    No opinion of CEO

    Pros

    Great people, good location, good benefits.

    Cons

    The vision of senior management for the employees seems flawed. They doubled the size of the staff in 2008 and then laid of 20% of the company in 2009; the majority of those affected had been employed for less than one year.

    Advice to Management

    Transparency, one of the goals of the company, should apply to senior management with employees as well as with customers. When the company had the layoff there had been no hint of trouble during the prior weekly all-hands meetings. The layoff itself was handled extremely poorly. Instead of notifying each employee affected individually, some people were told as a group. It was very disheartening and unprofessional.



RSS Feed </> Embed

Your response will be removed from the review – this cannot be undone.