Council on Foreign Relations Reviews
Updated May 4, 2012 – Reviews are posted anonymously by employees.
|
www.cfr.org
Company Rating Based on 11 ratings Employees are “Satisfied” |
CEO Rating
Based on 6 ratings
President and Director |
Council on Foreign Relations has 371 connections on Glassdoor
| 1–10 of 11 Council on Foreign Relations Reviews | Sort by |
Pros
Incredibly smart people, great benefits and place to have a very good work/life balance. Intellectually stimulating work, friendly work environment.
Cons
Opportunities for growth are limited, management could try harder to find and retain better talent.
Advice to Senior Management
Should find a way to better retain talent.
Pros
Brand recognition; opportunities to sit in on not for attribution meetings with high level officials; monthly professional development classes.
Cons
Professionalism not consistent across departments; paid little for long work days; lack of respect for junior employees
Advice to Senior Management
Standardize professionalism across departments and pay Richard Haass less; he makes x28 what the most junior employee makes.
Pros
Very smart people at CFR
Cons
Pay lower than in private sector
Pros
great benefits
fridays off in the summer
lots of time off
casual work attire during the summer
free food during events
Cons
low wages
Hierarchical behavior by memebers and some staffers
no room for growth
division between NY and DC location
Pros
It's a prestigious place to work, and can be a great stepping stone.
Cons
Best to leave after about two years. Not much opportunities for growth, and it's a very bureaucratic, tradition-laden place, so the day to day can be very frustrating.
Advice to Senior Management
It's basically run like a bureaucracy. Some of the leadership hasn't changed for decades, and is very opposed to change.
Pros
Highly competitive, great staff, flexible and reasonable hours, interesting topics, ability to work one on one with fellows and researchers
Cons
Small stipend, assisting and helping out for meetings
Advice to Senior Management
Fellows do a great work, they should interact more with each other
Pros
The work is interesting and stimulating. Surrounding by intelligent people with a fairly laid back atmosphere and hours are not to demanding.
Cons
They do not pay enough and if you ask for more, they will tell you that they don't need to because there is an abundance of people who will work the same job for even less, there is no opportunity for professional growth or advancement.
Advice to Senior Management
Pay more money, create room with the institution for professional growth and for the younger staff to assume more responsibility.
Pros
- Lots of time off
- Some what low expectations
- Lots of Autonomy
- Great Team
Cons
- Incompetent leadership and supervisor
- No overall vision or goals for site
- No official process for anything
- Personal politics and relationships are a very strong driver in decision making
- No room to grow
Advice to Senior Management
- Require Goal Setting for the website
- Mandate upward reviews of superiors and managers
- Instantiate a process for project management
Pros
OK salary, learning experience, growth opportunities, connections
Cons
Very few opportunities to move up within the organization.
Advice to Senior Management
Offer more opportunities for research associates to grow within the organization.
Pros
Intellectual stimulation, people you meet, autonomy of work and work schedule.
Cons
being pulled in many directions at times by many different departments, which means work doesn't always get recognized.
Advice to Senior Management
Keep intellectual enterprise open, but recognize the numerous demands put on the fellows
