About Us

Glassdoor is your free inside look at Cisco Systems reviews and ratings — including employee satisfaction and approval rating for Cisco Systems CEO John T. Chambers . All reviews posted anonymously by Cisco Systems employees.

Search

for

in

Advanced

Cisco Systems – “Cisco: Good if you're looking for job security. Bad if you're looking for career advancement.

3 of 3 people found this helpful

Jun 26, 2009

2.0

Cisco Systems Program Manager in San Jose, CA:   (Current Employee)

Pros

Cisco is great for job security and takes great measures to retain FTEs. The ability to get your work done with flexible hours and/or the ability to work from home is also a GREAT perk. And because of the size of the company, there are a lot of options to move internally (lateral) to see different sides of the business.

Cons

There is an excessive amount of middle management layers, which can often result in poor top-to-bottom communication and poor bottom-to-top visibility. Cisco is also not very good at career advancement, specifically if you are an ambitious go-getter, as promotions and raises tend to have more to do with seniority and less to do with performance. They also have an internal policy that you can not get promoted when you switch positions. While I believe the intent was so that people do not jump from job to job simply for a pay increase, what happens in practice is top performers who move to a new opportunity for a new challenge, have to make that move laterally even when it is a job with more responsibility. However, if you stay in the same role for years, you will eventually get promoted just because of seniority. As a result, many top performers make a few lateral moves and then leave the company in order to get a promotion.

Advice to Senior Management

I would strongly recommend Cisco remove the policy that employees cannot get promoted when they change roles as this is demotivating and penalizes top performers. I would also love to see 360 reviews extend beyond Chambers senior mangement team, or at least require that managers are reviewed by a minimum of 1 direct report as part of the yearly review process.

Comment (1)

Aug 20, 2009

by bad:

Bad overall. That's the conclusion I came up with.
Inappropriate?
Post an anonymous review or sign in to comment on this review
Cisco Systems Overview (CSCO)
Web
www.cisco.com
Industries
Size
5000+ Employees, $39B+ Revenue
HQ
San Jose, CA
Competitors


Flag this {0} as inappropriate

Would you like us to review something? Please describe the problem with this {0} and we will look into it.

Flag this {1} Cancel

Advanced Search Reset

What

Where

How

or Cancel