Oracle

  www.oracle.com
Work in HR? Unlock Free Profile

5492 Employee Reviews (View Most Recent)

Sort: Rating Date

 

Great company for the right person

  • Comp & Benefits
  • Work/Life Balance
  • Senior Management
  • Culture & Values
  • Career Opportunities
Current Employee - Sales Representative
Current Employee - Sales Representative

Pros

Oracle is very profitable, global leader. It has a comprehensive set of great products. Oracle has a focused industry strategy both broadly and within specific focus indusyties.

Cons

Oracle has the typical large company challenges of complexity. The resources are widely available but sometimes they can be a challenge to engage.

Advice to ManagementAdvice

Streamline decision making down to the field organizations.

Recommends
Positive Outlook
Approves of CEO

Other reviews for Oracle

  1.  

    Good Work Life Balance

    Current Employee - Anonymous Employee
    Current Employee - Anonymous Employee

    Pros

    Good work life balance, large amount of systems software. The company is stable and every product has a clear path to revenue unlike many other software companies. The benefits are good as well.

    Cons

    Very bureaucratic like every other big company. It can be incredibly difficult to get something even like a Macbook Pro. Many of the legacy systems code is quite painful, but it's a piece of software that makes money.

  2. 2 people found this helpful  

    Career Killer

    • Comp & Benefits
    • Work/Life Balance
    • Senior Management
    • Culture & Values
    • Career Opportunities
    Current Employee - Senior Product Manager  in  San Francisco, CA
    Current Employee - Senior Product Manager in San Francisco, CA

    Pros

    Flexible workhours, Good benefits, Some very capable and pleasant foreign employees trapped at Oracle due to visa/greencard issues.

    Cons

    Everything Else.

    Management is clueless about even most fundamental facts about the marketplace, and this informs their complete lack of strategic direction. Communications with mid/senior mgmt are limited to nasty dictates on impossible deadlines with no upward flow of information. Direction turns on a dime and years of effort by many people are just thrown out the window without any accountability by the "leadership". In few cases where game-changing innovations are proposed (that entail little cost) mgmt doesn't even understand them! Direction for 7 years has been to deliver SaaS business aps, but no one ever thought of the infrastructural components required or how the internal processes would need to change. Now that the s#$% is hitting the fan mgmt's solution is to demand more work within the same impossible delivery schedule. Bottom line is that mgmt is a net value subtract. We would be better off with self-managing teams.

    ZERO, ZERO, ZERO compensation or career growth. In the very rare cases of promotions (maybe 3 out of hundreds of people in 7 years???) there is no increase in compensation. No or trivial increases and bonuses for anyone I know for the past 5 years. Any time someone leaves in the US they are either not replaced (and rest of the team has to pick up the workload, or they are replaced by somone in India.

    Workload is very high, deadlines are very aggressive. No one cares that the dev environments or tools needed to do the job are unavailable. Demands are to close bugs not to fix the root causes. Dev environments are so unstable that efficiency is minimal. PMs can be responsible for aps for which they don't even have working environments to use. Acronyms are rampant and no one knows what half of them mean. There is no onboarding training of new people and no way to find out half of what you need to do your job. People with 10 yrs of tenure still don't know basic things about how related processes work. There are no internal resources for finding out who to talk to about a particular product or tool or internal business process that is critical to your job. Instead lots of people just use do an email blitz (ie. 'spam') asking questions which results in only the most fragmentary knowledge transfer.

    Many teams are dominated by legacy folks that view the status quo, 80s style enterprise software as the ideal and resist any innovation. Much of the software designs are patterned on 30 yo approaches. Many PM, Strategy and DEV personnel seem oblivious to the innovations happening right down the road from them. Going to work is like going back in time, except that now the workforce is 60% Indian. Nothing has changed but the demographics...

    Advice to ManagementAdvice

    Get a clue.

    Doesn't Recommend
    Negative Outlook
    Disapproves of CEO
There are newer employer reviews for Oracle.

Worked for Oracle? Contribute to the Community!

Your response will be removed from the review – this cannot be undone.