There are newer employer reviews for US Department of State
There are newer employer reviews for US Department of State

See Most Recent

Helpful (1)

Fantastic opportunity

  • Work/Life Balance
  • Culture & Values
  • Career Opportunities
  • Comp & Benefits
  • Senior Management
Current Employee - Special Agent in Washington, DC
Current Employee - Special Agent in Washington, DC
Recommends
Neutral Outlook
Approves of CEO

I have been working at US Department of State full-time (More than 8 years)

Pros

-Rent free living overseas (NOT tax free). -Chance to see the world. -Chance to feel a sense of value and purpose in your mission. -Chance to formulate change in policies and relationships with other nation states. -Excellent benefits package. -Job Security!

Cons

-A lot of time away from family and friends back home. -Work can be demanding on your time. -Frequent travel, which isn't bad, but continual travel and constant relocation does wear you down after a while. -Exposure to some of the more interesting insects, viruses, and challenges to modern medicine. ;-)

Advice to Management

-Leadership, Leadership, Leadership. -Share information and lessons learned. -Definitely moving in the right direction, but there are some critical areas of improvement still needed.

Other Employee Reviews for US Department of State

  1. Helpful (10)

    Should be a dream job, but the State Department lacks integrity

    • Work/Life Balance
    • Culture & Values
    • Career Opportunities
    • Comp & Benefits
    • Senior Management
    Former Employee - Foreign Service Officer
    Former Employee - Foreign Service Officer
    Doesn't Recommend
    Negative Outlook
    No opinion of CEO

    I worked at US Department of State full-time (More than 3 years)

    Pros

    The salary is great and you will have very unique learning experiences

    Cons

    I'd love to write a positive review, much as I would have loved to enjoy working in the US State Department after spending my entire life studying and training to be a Foreign Service Officer. As soon as I showed up for the A100 class, though, I was disgusted by the culture of politics and self promotion that permeates the department. When I got to post to do the work, I was astounded at the level of managerial incompetence. This is an institution that lacks the managerial skills to effectively manage its burdens, and lacks the integrity to address those deficiencies honestly. Instead of focusing on performing the job they're paid to do, officers focus uniformly on getting good written reviews from supervisors and building good "corridor reputations," by going along with managerial incompetence and aggressive politicking. I was astounded at just how much of an officer's work is spent on internal politics vs. doing the actual job. The culture is filled with unhappy people spending much of their work trying to figure out how to correct the mess they find, hide the problems they encounter so that they won't embarrass their managers, and politic around to get the next dream post in a far away land. It's tragic. Many officers pretend that the work "representing their country" makes up for the managerial shortfalls, but in my observations those shortfalls meant that we actually were often doing anything but the real work of out country or representing the US with integrity. The cons are balanced by the unique opportunities if you can stomach giving up integrity for politics, and the reality that you can save a lot of money in the job. Indeed, a lot of officers spend the bulk of their time figuring out how to game the system and earn more money and perks, which leads to yet more politics. The support services are often so overwhelmed that you have to do their job for them, and politic just to make sure things run smoothly. Everyone bends over backwards to help out people in positions of power, but everyone else has to push to make sure things get done. Fundamentally, the institution lacks integrity, which is tragic given how important it is and the consequences of its failures. The scandals you read about in the headlines are only the very tip of an iceberg, because State is very adept at "putting the needs of the service first" and getting officers to hide its dirty laundry in return for career opportunities.

    Advice to Management

    Replace the EER process with a real peer review. It is absurd that people work to make sure they have a good EER as opposed to achieve real results, and the EER process is widely abused and manipulated. The fact that an entire month is practically devoid of task work because officers are focused on the EER cycle says a lot about where priorities lie within the culture, and should be a point of shame. Implement opportunities for officers to expose incompetence and provide anonymous feedback other than the Dissent Channel, which is too high level for the many serious but mundane issues. Until State shows integrity in the way it manages its employees, for example by not abusing junior officers in visa tours, it won't fund much integrity amongst its officers. Which is a shame cause outside of the State system they are some very good people.


  2. Diplomatic Mission

    • Work/Life Balance
    • Culture & Values
    • Career Opportunities
    • Comp & Benefits
    • Senior Management
    Current Employee - Economic Officer in Washington, DC
    Current Employee - Economic Officer in Washington, DC
    Recommends
    Neutral Outlook
    Approves of CEO

    I have been working at US Department of State full-time (More than a year)

    Pros

    job security, serving your country at oversea

    Cons

    bureacratic, too many layers of management

    Advice to Management

    be more agile and responsive to its employees and missions


There are newer employer reviews for US Department of State
There are newer employer reviews for US Department of State

See Most Recent

Work at US Department of State? Share Your Experiences

US Department of State

 
Click to Rate
or

Your response will be removed from the review – this cannot be undone.