US Economic Research Service

  www.ers.usda.gov
  www.ers.usda.gov
There are newer employer reviews for US Economic Research Service

 

I learned a lot about U.S. agricultural economic policy.

  • Comp & Benefits
  • Work/Life Balance
  • Senior Management
  • Career Opportunities
Current Employee - Agricultural Economist in Washington, DC
Current Employee - Agricultural Economist in Washington, DC

I have been working at US Economic Research Service

Pros

There are a lot a resources for research support--money to support co-authors, money for conference travel, money to organize small conferences, and money to buy data. This is one of the world's largest concentration of PhDs with an interest in agricultural economics. There are opportunities to do policy-relevant research, and ERS has a reputation among agricultural policymakers and stakeholders for doing good empirical research. The work-life balance is good. It's possible (although becoming more difficult) to be promoted to the GS-15 level as a researcher without having to go into management.

Cons

The standards for what is good research are those of agricultural economics, which tend to be different from (some would say lower than) the standards in the rest of economics. In one sense this is good, because the bar for promotion should be lower. But some of the senior management (as opposed to branch chiefs) don't seem to be able to tell the difference between high quality research and low quality research, or at least they don't seem to reward it. There is a review process for promotion, but it's fairly opaque. Compensation is good for agricultural economics, but on the low side for economics. Some of the more experienced staff (of which there are many) are about 20 years behind the research frontier. Some of these same experienced staff have no respect for newer staff if the newer staff did not grow up on a farm, even though in many cases the newer staff have better econometric skills. In some cases the lack of respect is quite overt. Management seems to recognize this, but they don't seem to be able to do anything about it.

4 Other Employee Reviews for US Economic Research Service (View Most Recent)

Sort: Rating Date
  1.  

    Highly professional staff and work environment with excellent IT support.

    • Comp & Benefits
    • Work/Life Balance
    • Senior Management
    • Culture & Values
    • Career Opportunities
    Former Employee - Anonymous Employee
    Former Employee - Anonymous Employee

    I worked at US Economic Research Service full-time

    Pros

    Unique opportunity to work in one of the largest research organizations in the world with a line staff of primarily Ph.D level economists (200 +) specializing in agricultural and food economics. Good job security and retirement benefits. Very good annual and sick leave benefits. Good access to data for research and analysis. Ability to limit on site work to 2 days a week (4 ten hour days) with 2 days telecommuting.

    Cons

    Small cubicle environment for new hires (non-management) and lower level staff. Limited number of non-management positions at the grade 15 level.

    Recommends
  2.  

    Disorganized but pleasant

    • Comp & Benefits
    • Work/Life Balance
    • Senior Management
    • Culture & Values
    • Career Opportunities
    Former Employee - IT Intern in Washington, DC
    Former Employee - IT Intern in Washington, DC

    I worked at US Economic Research Service as an intern (less than an year)

    Pros

    People are very friendly, and I felt very welcomed as an intern. For interns they had various outings to learn more about US agriculture, as well as bond with other interns.

    Cons

    I wasn't given very much work to do, and the work I did do got lost. My supervisor was often too busy to have time to talk about my work.

    Doesn't Recommend
    Neutral Outlook
There are newer employer reviews for US Economic Research Service

Work at US Economic Research Service? Share Your Experiences

US Economic Research Service

 
Click to Rate
or

Your response will be removed from the review – this cannot be undone.