First American Reviews
Updated Dec 22, 2011 – Reviews are posted anonymously by employees.
|
Company Rating Based on 38 ratings Employees say it's "OK" |
CEO Rating
Based on 4 ratings
CEO and Director |
See who your friends know who've worked at First American and could give you an inside look.
See who your friends know who've worked at First American and could help you prep for an interview.
| 1–10 of 38 First American Reviews | Sort by |
Pros
Fair company with good environment.
Cons
Some areas are slow to promote. High turnover in certain areas.
Advice to Senior Management
Continue treating all employees fairly--whether they are full or part time employees.
Pros
...had one of the best managers ever...professional, not a micromanager, and very patient which is extremely rare these days. Good people, training, work-environment, benefits, pay was average.
Cons
Unfortunately, my Department got outsourced which was a big bummer. Would have liked to build a career here. Hard to do so now in the global economy.
Advice to Senior Management
My direct manager was great. Upper management was a bit bogged down in reports, systems, and somewhat isolated from the rank and file workers.
Pros
I benefit from decent pay (despite the fact that I still make about the same salary I made ten years ago), although I do not know whether or not it is comparable to the salary paid for the same job at competing companies. I get the impression that my particular office might pay some of its employees better than our neighboring competitors.
Our Information Technology Department is excellent. The specialists are knowledgeable, smart, usually helpful and responsive, and friendly. (If that last characteristic seems unimportant to you, try working with a snarly I.T. person. I have at other companies, and it's beyond unpleasant.)
Our dedication to technology seems progressive, at least to a point.
Some (although I don't know how many) employees are allowed to work remotely, either full-time or periodically.
Most of the managers are intelligent, dedicated, hard-working, professional, and compassionate persons, who bring those characteristics to the office.
The overall culture, which is attributable to individual employees (including managers) with stellar personalities rather than to the basic structure of the corporation (as I describe in the following "Cons" section) is one of respect, cooperation, professionalism, support, customer focus, education, pride in work-product, and humor.
Cons
Anyone considering working for First American needs to recognize that First American is a publicly-traded company. Like any other publicly-traded company, First American is structured to make a profit and adhere to its legal fiduciary duty to its stockholders. The board of directors does not have the luxury of benevolence to employees, and its only consideration is making money in whatever way is legally possible. Therefore, I imagine that some of my complaints about First American are the same complaints made by employees at other public companies. You must realize that First American may not show you loyalty simply because of your hard work or the time (in hours each day and years of your life) that you have devoted to it or your superior education or your extensive experience or your charming personality. It is a business, and you will be one of its tools, nothing more. So, managers, whether good or bad, whether egalitarian or tyrannical, are pressured to take action--whatever action is possible--to reduce losses and increase income.
I feel like the minion of some tyrant. Some of the aspects of the company that I enjoy are not necessarily bestowed upon other employees. An employee's position is dictated by so many factors, including a given employee's ability to negotiate, as well as how a manager runs its office. My recommendation is to pay attention to the structured items, such as salary and benefits, and try to ascertain the culture of the office in which you will work. Compare those factors to any alternatives you might have.
Realize, however, that those "structured items" could change at any time. Years ago, the hours of operation changed for some offices (longer hours, of course) without any corresponding compensation to salaried employees. (Had we a union, such a theft would not have been permitted.) Many employees were already working more hours than those created by the new schedule; however, the result required more customer face time that had been used for production. Plus, come on, the principle of the thing! Benefits, also, are re-evaluated and subject to change each year (which might include an increase in an employee's contribution greater than any increase in pay). Also, after the effects of the recession became apparent, along with layoffs came pay decreases. I do not think pay decreases are necessarily evil, especially if it helps other employees keep their jobs. (Apparently, though, some offices were still making a profit, yet their employees' pay were reduced anyway.)
Employees across the country are overloaded, especially since layoffs. Managers are expected to reduce costs, increase revenue, and reduce the number of claims (claims being a natural component of the title insurance industry). Managers take advantage of good employees, giving them the most work and responsibility. Those better employees appear to be compensated better than their "less valuable" colleagues; however, I suspect that in some cases those "less valuable" employees should have been terminated long ago. (Politics, excessively sympathetic managers, and incompetent personnel management play roles here.) On the other hand, some of those "less valuable" employees simply take care of themselves by protecting their personal lives (by actually having one) and refusing work if it is beyond human capability to perform it. That perspective (protecting oneself, which I completely respect) combined with the facts of less-effective employees, layoffs, and increased business (yes, more work--I understand that First American is making a profit--at least some offices are) make those employees who work too much (out of fear, guilt, manipulation, promise of a better day, ignorance of being snowed, whatever) miserable.
Of course, managers, too, face that misery. Many managers are asked to manage offices and personnel while doing the work of that personnel. I recognize that plugging holes is part of the role of management; however, those holes should be temporary. It appears that so many managers are bogged down with management, sales, title work, closings, traveling, educating, and getting educated that the expectations are unrealistic. (I am not a manager, by the way.)
Pros
Work at home, so schedule was very flexible.
Cons
No raise, no bonus, no promotion for 4 years do to company wide freeze/
Pros
Co workers are excellent and cafeteria is great place to eat cheap. There is also some chance for travel
Cons
Too many to mention here but key ones are:
Lack of recognition
Impossible to get things done due to politics
Decentralization has left the company without a central identity or focus
Advice to Senior Management
Get rid of Dennis Gilmore as FAST AS POSSIBLE. His short sighted and dictatorial rule will eventually kill the creativity and loyalty of any good people left. The new head of HR is also worthless
Pros
Great product, employee teams that care, and vast resources. Good benefits and a generally pleasant atmosphere.
Cons
3 years of no raises despite stellar reviews, Senior Management that thinks its ok to reduce workers pay by 5-10% every year for 90-120 days, then give it back as if it was a raise, no promotion opportunities, uneven application of performance standards, and no recognition outside of your immediate management team.
Advice to Senior Management
You going to lose smart, talented, and eager workers to companies that treat employees as a resource. Recognize talent and treat them like you want them to stay.
Pros
Decent benefits, that is about it.
Cons
Poor Management, can be long hours, stressful, no opportunity for growth
Advice to Senior Management
Hire and train better managers
Pros
First American is a stable company. They are beginning to make improvements with benefits but there is still some work to be done in this arena.
Cons
Pay is often less than you would find in other large corporations and most of the time it's even less than you would find in smaller companies. Lots of work to be done here.
Advice to Senior Management
Please remember that people are people and things come up and we are only humans. Treat your employees like humans and not just another number.
Pros
Good benefits, flexible schedule, name recognition
Cons
Extremely poor reputation, customer service from within is non existent, the product is hard to believe in when there are so many denials & issues
Pros
Benefits are better than many
Cons
NO opportunity for career development
Low Pay
Advice to Senior Management
Deal with issues promptly, even when they lie with management!

