Post a Salary or Review

Join Now or Sign In

Advanced

ING Canada Reviews

Post a Review

Web: www.intactfc.com | HQ: Toronto, Canada

Connections

Reviews are posted anonymously by employees.

Company Rating Based on 5 ratings 3.6 Employees are "Satisfied"	CEO Rating Based on 2 ratings “Do you approve of the way this person is handling the job of leading this company?” 100% Approve 0% Disapprove 2 responses Charles Brindamour President, CEO, and Director 100% Approve

Company Rating Based on 5 ratings

3.6

Employees are "Satisfied"

CEO Rating Based on 2 ratings

Charles Brindamour

President, CEO, and Director

100% Approve

See who your friends know who've worked at ING Canada and could give you an inside look.

See who your friends know who've worked at ING Canada and could help you prep for an interview.

Show Filters

1–5 of 5 ING Canada Reviews

Sort by

Apr 30, 2010

4.0

Details

Compensation & Benefits	5.0
Senior Leadership	5.0
Communication	3.5
Work/Life Balance	2.5
Recognition & Feedback	3.0
Employee Morale	4.5
Career Opportunities	4.5
Fairness & Respect	3.5

Approves of CEO

ING Canada Anonymous: (Current Employee)

“Good employer”

Pros

benefits and career advancement oportunities

Cons

long hours and lack of communication

Advice to Senior Management

should offer possibility to evaluate managers

Nov 3, 2009

4.0

Details

Compensation & Benefits	3.0
Senior Leadership	4.0
Communication	4.0
Work/Life Balance	5.0
Recognition & Feedback	4.0
Employee Morale	4.0
Career Opportunities	4.0
Fairness & Respect	4.0

Approves of CEO

ING Canada Anonymous in Toronto, ON (Canada): (Current Employee)

“Good place to work and grow. Also a good place if you r not that aggressive”

Pros

At least my manager is a very reasonable person. Happy to work with him.

Cons

Sometimes some people are busy working like pig, some are not.

Advice to Senior Management

Should bravely kick out those 'bad' birds, instead of everyone's being safe. It would be nice to provide VPN access.

Jan 1, 2009

4.0

Details

Compensation & Benefits	3.5
Senior Leadership	3.5
Communication	3.5
Work/Life Balance	5.0
Recognition & Feedback	4.0
Employee Morale	3.0
Career Opportunities	3.0
Fairness & Respect	3.5

No Opinion of CEO

ING Canada Anonymous in Toronto, ON (Canada): (Current Employee)

“A large P&C Organization”

Pros

Company is making steps to improve their work environment. Work / Home balance is a global goal.

Cons

Company is very process bound. Not a lot of entrpreneurial spirit is encouraged. Something of a top down command and control structure.

Advice to Senior Management

Few committees, more direct responsibility and accountability

Jun 13, 2008

4.0

Details

Compensation & Benefits	4.5
Senior Leadership	3.0
Communication	2.5
Work/Life Balance	2.5
Recognition & Feedback	4.0
Employee Morale	4.0
Career Opportunities	3.0
Fairness & Respect	3.5

No Opinion of CEO

ING Canada Claims Representative in Edmonton, AB (Canada): (Current Employee)

“Ing the future of canadian insurance”

Pros

the perks
good atmosphere
good management

Cons

the work environment(ie. cubical spaces) are a bit out dated and kind of drab
employes are not always informed of process changes all the tim and the training of new staff is not yet standardized across the board

Advice to Senior Management

i would tell that to look at the people working for them and make them happy first before trying to improve them because if the employees are not happy then they will not be motivated to work harder for the company.... a happy worker makes a happy manager.

Jun 12, 2008

2.0

Details

Compensation & Benefits	2.5
Senior Leadership	3.0
Communication	4.0
Work/Life Balance	4.0
Recognition & Feedback	1.5
Employee Morale	2.5
Career Opportunities	3.0
Fairness & Respect	3.0

ING Canada Anonymous in Toronto, ON (Canada): (Current Employee)

“Okay”

Pros

ING is a very reputable company, one of the largest insurer's in Canada. The people who work there are all very friendly and generally willing to help.

Cons

Little to no recognition is given for a job- if it even gets reviewed. There does not seem like much possibility for advancement or career development through the company that is publicly advertised anyways. There is little or no effort made towards technical evolution- the company seems to be happy to continue doing things the way they have always been done and suggestions to do otherwise are not generally received well. They should recognize this in order to become better overall as a company.

Advice to Senior Management

None.