Mercer Reviews
Updated Feb 6, 2012 – Reviews are posted anonymously by employees.
|
Company Rating Based on 240 ratings Employees say it's "OK" |
CEO Rating
Based on 109 ratings
Chairman and CEO |
See who your friends know who've worked at Mercer and could give you an inside look.
See who your friends know who've worked at Mercer and could help you prep for an interview.
| 1–10 of 240 Mercer Reviews | Sort by |
Pros
people there are great; you can learn a great deal there with very competent supervisors. Not as busy and tiring as other consulting firms
Cons
limited career advancement. At the same time, by joining the firm, you might be constrained to HR consulting to some extent. It does not matter if you wanna pursue this as your long term career goal
Advice to Senior Management
The leaders at Mercer are great and offer timely feedback to the employees. If lunch can provided in door, I believe efficiency can be much higher
Pros
The organization is always changing which allows for opportunity and growth
Cons
Change management is not great and layoffs are constant
Advice to Senior Management
Show appreciation to their staff
Pros
confortable environment with friendly people around.
Many daily tasks with some side work. Good in general.
Cons
since most of them are repeated work, some might feel not being challenged.
Pros
It is a great place to start off if you want to work in the industry but don't expect to see much growth unless you move from company to company every so often
Cons
The Canadian office tajes direction from the US office even though they are two distinctly different lines of business resulting in budget balancing that does not necessarily make sense.
Advice to Senior Management
Allow the Canadian division to be run separately from the US it will greatly improve the employee and management relations.
Pros
Vactaion
Holiday
Flexibility
Work from home
Retirement account
No stress
Cons
Disorganized Senior Leadership strategy
Constant Reoganization
Power struggle type situations
Behind the times in terms of technology
To much emphasis on offshore work and not enough on quality of product
Advice to Senior Management
Some of the past leadership did not have the skills needed and were to busy worried about their image. Anytime a project was not going well and this was bought to their attention, that person was too negative and not a team player. This became the atmosphere and culture, where senior leadership did not want to hear anything negative about projects, etc. This spread throughout the organization, especially Application Development. Projects would not meet goals and deadlines, and that management passed the buck. This lead to the constant Reorgs or people moving on.
Pros
- Good dental and welfare benefits. Medical getting pricey and no HSA account option.
- Co-workers are generally okay to work with.
- Good location for those taking the train and always find parking.
- Ability to be proactive if you are lucky and get a decent manager.
Cons
- You are treated like a child. You get told what to do by Senior Associates and above which hinders your growth as a manager. This will hurt you when trying to get out of the company to one that expect you to know how to manage.
- Remote management is terrible. Often the top managers are not in the same place as those that report to them. This causes problems to run rampant with no action taken with these guys to improve their ability to manage people. You are micro-managed with most everything but your manager might hardly be managed at all.
- Compensation is way lower than average market value. Some managers can make less than the people who report to them while outside hires are given higher salaries for job-hopping. This is not an isolated incident. I've been with the company for over 7 years and it happens all the time.
- Poorly managed HR team. They don't understand their function and don't partner with managers to resolve employee issues. They are scared of lawsuits but create an unfair environment for the over-performing employees.
- Schedules aren't flexible at all. Many of my direct reports get told this in the interview only to find out they are tied to a rigid schedule. Favortism reigns supreme so if you allow yourself to be micro-managed and never push back, you'll do just fine.
- Company training is a joke, plain and simple. Leadership gets mad when you ask questions without reading through every piece of material ever published about the subject. Ridiculous. I always embrace questions from my employees and simply can not accept the overall lack of ownership / responsibility taken by Senior Associates and above to do their job the right way.
Advice to Senior Management
Watch your Senior Associates, Principles and management much closer. Right under your nose you are losing top talent because people are afraid to ask questions. Get into the new age and get rid of the old management cliches that the loudest person in the room gets their way and that employees need to be told what to do. Teach them how to be leaders and top talent will stop running away.
Pros
Global, market leader, camraderie among local staff, pretty good benefits
Cons
Leadership is terrible at the Mercer and Investment Consulting level - no communication, lack of vision, exclusionary, does not reward top talent
Pros
Postive coworkers, advanced training programs, and good teamwork system.
Cons
Almost always work longer than a 40 hr a week job.
Pros
Nice group of people, understood "teaming", decent benefits, interesting projects.
Cons
Opportunities for promotions were difficult, could improve mentoring junior staff.
Advice to Senior Management
Mentoring junior staff can only help the company grow its talent.
Pros
Not very demanding
Location is convenient
Cons
Tools and software are outdated
No clear objectives, project management non-existent
Few opportunities to learn
Offices are spread widely, making communication slow and inefficient


