Oliver Wyman Reviews
Updated Jan 20, 2012 – Reviews are posted anonymously by employees.
|
Company Rating Based on 96 ratings Employees say it's "OK" |
CEO Rating
Based on 56 ratings
CEO |
See who your friends know who've worked at Oliver Wyman and could give you an inside look.
See who your friends know who've worked at Oliver Wyman and could help you prep for an interview.
| 31–40 of 96 Oliver Wyman Reviews | Sort by |
Pros
Consistently has some of the most unique, friendly, and interesting staff in the business.
Great place for international travel.
Content can be engaging in strategy projects.
Lack of management infrastructure gives a entreprenurial feel to the business, meaning you can make whatever you chose of it.
Cons
Lack of management and infrastructure while sometimes a plus, can be a huge pain.
In recent years, the firm has been running in overdrive with little downtime.
Compensation is broadly out of line with equivalent levels of responsibilities at other firms and more political that some might prefer.
Advice to Senior Management
Revisit the performance management system.
Develop a coherent North America strategy.
Pros
There are alot of smart people and the pay is decent. You have some opportunity to travel abroad for work. People like to drink alot
Cons
Do not sponsor MBA. Long hours. No checks and balances on partners - they can abuse consultants as much as they want. Very little freedom in staffing process
Advice to Senior Management
Change incentive system for partners to align more with firm.
Pros
Steady Paycheck
4 weeks vacation
Regional Firm Days with all expense paid trips for all staff as a team building exercise
Cons
Poor Management Staff
Lack of communication
Overworked consultants
Cranky overbearing partners
Heavy workload with little time to balance work/life
Not a very diverse environment to work in
Fast talking HC department that doesn't really care about employee concerns
Advice to Senior Management
Recruit with Diversity and Inclusion in mind
Promote based on skill set and not tenure
Recruit more competent managers to reduce turnover rate
Pros
-Young peers and fun atmosphere
-great management from the lower level managers
-reasonable pay consistent with the industry
-easy to climb the ladder
Cons
_sometimes upper level management seem to forget that analyst and consutants exist
-most work better to market our name in a competitive environment
Advice to Senior Management
dont forget our analyst and dont forget to market our name beyond europe. we are a growing company, if we stop now, we will die
Pros
steep learning curve - teaches good analytical and presentation skills
interesting people
perks
Cons
work/life balance non-existent
meaningfulness of work
Advice to Senior Management
care more about your employees
maintain integrity of the work
Pros
The firm provides interesting work, smart people to work with, and decent salary and benefits. It's questionable why a consulting company like this one should be under the MMC umbrella.
Cons
Although the marketing dept is working on it, brand awareness is very low due to the frequency of name changes. It's hard to compete with the better-known brands.
Advice to Senior Management
Break up the silos so that each part of the firm can equal more than its share as a whole.
Pros
Good colleagues
Great off-sites
Good pay your first year
Cons
No brand recognition
Long hours
Excessive travel schedule
Boring/Back-office type projects
Poor exit opportunities
Advice to Senior Management
Strengthen your brand name
Put more emphasis on career development
Pros
Very smart people
Very driven people
Youthful, fun culture
Reasonable expense policy
Opportunity for travel
Cons
MIs-managed staffing (you will get staffed on projects you absolutely hate)
Work you to the bone; if you are lucky, you get nice staffing policies (maybe 60-65 / week); if you are unlucky - welcome to IBanking Hours + Travel
Advice to Senior Management
The "eat what you earn" model makes sense to some extent, but it is limiting the company from being a real competitor and a brand name as recognized as McKinsey / Bain / BCG. Seriously - people are smarter than many of those places but the company refuses to grow to become as successful as it could. And by the way - doing that does not come from working consultants like crazy or in unsafe global locations.
Pros
Managers are very good about managing work/life balance, at least for employees. They value competence in their employees. Good time off and good benefits. Tuition reimbursement and encouragement to "better" one's self
Cons
For Administrative Assistants, there is little to no room for advancement. There is no cooperation between departments so work flow is not evened out. Little training for admins.
Advice to Senior Management
More cooperation across groups, including administrative support would better utilize available talent.
Pros
Top level strategy engagements that are challenging and interesting
Great people/culture
Fast upward mobility and flexibility in changing between business units
Large moves toward fully integrating all recent acquisitions
Cons
Still some growing pains as acquisitions are incorporated into business
Need to work on improving recruiting effort and brand given the current size of firm
Advice to Senior Management
Continue investing in brand and a strong recruiting effort...we've grown faster than our competitors and need to make sure we go to bat as firm of comparable size since we're anything but niche at this point

