PRTM Management Reviews
-
2 of 2 people found this helpful
Pros
PRTM provides great opportunity to work with senior leaders in the firm as the partner (i.e., Director) to consultant ratio is significantly lower than that of other firms.
If you enjoy operations and different aspects of how to improve how companies run, this is the place to be.
In addition, there is no formalized "up-or-out" policy allowing for formal fexibility - which can be good and bad.Cons
One of the higher partner profitability firms in management consulting with a small pyramid (consultants per partner) means several things at PRTM:
- Lowe(er) wages for non-partners
- High billable targets for consultants (leaves little slack capacity for firm growth)
- Few non-consulting resources (e.g., no research staff)
- Little/no investment in formal consultant training
- Little/no budget for team building
- A gerneral low-cost approach to everything
This makes it difficult for PRTM to attract top talent and grow effectively into new areas. However, PRTM tries to compensate by not having a formal "up-or-out" policy.Advice to Senior Management
It is important to realize the value of marketing and brand recognition beyond revenue generated per dollar invested.
-
Anonymous in Mountain View, CA:
“Not sure if I can recommend this first”
Aug 13, 2009
1 found helpful
-
Anonymous in New York, NY:
“PRTM review”
Jul 22, 2009
-
Associate (A2) in Washington, DC:
“Results focused”
Jul 12, 2009
-
Anonymous in Waltham, MA:
“Good firm overall- better for Directors and Principals”
Jul 9, 2009
-
Principal in Waltham, MA:
“Great for men, engineers, those who want 4-5 days travel through out career”
Jun 25, 2009
1 found helpful
-
Manager:
“Rapidly gain valuable experience; Difficult to make Director (partner) in current environment”
Jun 2, 2009
-
Associate in Costa Mesa, CA:
“A good company overall but very much a niche area focus in program management type of work”
May 13, 2009
-
Principal:
“Good, not great.”
Apr 20, 2009
-
Senior Associate in Mountain View, CA:
“Small firm that is still trying to determine where it fits”
Mar 14, 2009