Parker Hannifin Reviews
Link
Embed
Twitter
Facebook
Digg
Salaries |
| |
Reviews |
| |
Interviews |
| |
Jobs |
-
Sep 10, 2009
2009-09-10 09:03 PDT
Details
Pros
When I first started working at PH, I enjoyed working for a small division within a large corporation. We were very innovative, entrepreneurial, and fast for change even though associated with a huge company. Division management treated employees fairly, raises were average, and profit sharing very good.
Eventually, the division was closed due to downturn in automotive business, aquisitions, and global competition.Cons
Management in Cleveland needs to pay attention to the talent in the divisions. Cleveland HQ would spend money and allocate to the divisions to pay for computer systems, HQ, planes and travel without consulting the divisions. They forgot that all divisions are not created equal. Many would be still around or more profitable had Cleveland management paid more attention to the needs and affordability of the division.
Advice to Senior Management
Excellent senior management. Extremely well run company. I would work for PH again. It was the best five years of my working career. I still have all my PH shares of stock.
Helpful Review?
Yes |
No
Share:
-
Sales Engineer in Changwon (South Korea):
“Management Company”
Jul 21, 2009
-
Anonymous in Irvine, CA:
“Very stable place to make a living; lousy place to have a career”
Jul 4, 2009
-
Senior Material Handler in Chetek, WI:
“Parker Plant needs New Management”
May 17, 2009
1 found helpful
-
Employee in Irvine, CA:
“Company decent, Compensation Sucks.”
May 9, 2009
1 found helpful
-
Manager:
“Good company, going downhill”
Jan 17, 2009
-
Manager in Lynchburg, VA:
“Good company with bad promotional system”
Dec 28, 2008
-
Systems Engineer in Irvine, CA:
“Parker is a good, stable place to work.”
Dec 22, 2008
1 found helpful
-
Material Handler:
“How Blind can Management Be?”
Dec 2, 2008
-
Sales Manager:
“A Steady Ship”
Nov 9, 2008
2 found helpful
