QAD Reviews
-
Pros
Lovely facilities on a beautiful bluff overlooking the Pacific Ocean, free lunch provided onsite daily, nice exercise room, mostly pleasant and intelligent co-workers. Interesting software and customers.
Cons
Top management has sense to hire smart people but then micro-manages them ("founders syndrome") and will not tolerate dissenting ideas. Subscribes to the Jack Welch (of GE) big company management theory that 10 percent of employees should arbitrarily be ranked as "under-performers" each review period (twice a year) resulting in lots of voluntary and involuntary turnover. Paranoia about job security leads to a "keep your head down and blame the other guy if something goes wrong" mentality. Promotion, review, and dismissal policies perceived to be completely random.
Advice to Senior Management
Change the "ten percent of our employees suck" review and dismissal policy. As the economy strengthens, you just give incentive to your workers who actually have the in-demand skills you need to grow the company to move to a place where risk-taking (and its attendant occasional failure) is not discouraged and they can make decisions based on their best professional judgment and not fear being arbitrarily dismissed because they said something the "top dog" didn't want to hear.
-
Consultant:
“QAD is a good stop in a career but not a career”
Sep 25, 2009
-
Anonymous:
“QAD - Slow Death”
Sep 6, 2009
-
Anonymous:
“QAD is not an easy place to work ”
Jul 18, 2009
-
Marketing Manager in Santa Barbara, CA:
“Dynamic industry, tough for QAD to keep up”
Jul 17, 2009
-
Anonymous in Santa Barbara, CA:
“QAD is flexible, and fun to work for, but you will work hard!”
Oct 6, 2008
1 comment
-
Consulting Manager:
“QAD is not what it used to be”
Sep 25, 2008