0% of the CEO
Pros – Advanced technology, global presence, more than three billion us dollars revenue.
Cons – Located mostly in midwest, and there fore not as easily accessible for workers in Northeeast corridor.
Advice to Senior Management – continue developing internal cloud and scale to compete globally. Continue developing, currently excellent team of employees, this is a precious asset.
Yes, I would recommend this company to a friend – I'm optimistic about the outlook for this company
Pros – the workers and managers including many executives were strong and valuable players in Internet business and marketing.
Cons – CEO was only focused on selling the unit. The other senior executives were strong, but were not given the freedom to grow the business for the long term.
The division I worked had a poor business model - the model was to sell it.
Advice to Senior Management – don't move so quickly into a new market that you're not willing to commit time, money and resources because you played with many people's lives when the organization was closed.
No, I would not recommend this company to a friend
Pros – Lots of resources and opportunities to learn new technologies.
Cons – When I was there, salary was very low (about 60% of what it should be). This doesn't matter now as the company has entered into a JV and been gutted.
No, I would not recommend this company to a friend – I'm not optimistic about the outlook for this company
Pros – Editorial group was a pleasure to work with.
Enjoyed the "family-oriented company" atmosphere.
Company sponsored events for employees.
Cons – Ongoing restructuring led to disorganization and confusing strategy.
Difficulty in synching product delivery with IT.
Unprofessional behavior from manager was never addressed by HR.
Advice to Senior Management – Micromanaging never leads to a positive product outcome. Suggest stepping back and letting editorial staff do his/her job.
Yes, I would recommend this company to a friend
1 person found this helpful
Pros – Generally treats its employees well. Time off, working flexibility are good, pensions, benefit were good but have been getting worse. Work life can be very pleasant and measured, all the usual trappings of a company their size.
Cons – No-one's heard of the company. People know the brands but expect to explain how to pronounce Reed Elsevier (reed el-severe) let alone what they do. It seems like change happens at a glacial place. Management has been turned over several times in the last 2yrs, this, coupled with the downturn, has led to continued product stagnation and a general lack of overall direction. They've been steadying the ship but don't have a rudder or any wind the sails.
Advice to Senior Management – Set some direction, communicate it, to the employees and to the market stick to it.
1 person found this helpful
Pros – Reed Elsevier provides a decent salary and package, compared to the rest of the industry, which is in dire straits.. Some nice co-workers made the experience pleasant on a day to day basis. Management is pleasant on the face of it, as it is most places in publishing, but gives poor, useless, or no feedback while a project is going on. It has a good reputation in an industry which has the shakes, thanks to diversified products that keep its neck above water.
Cons – There is poor communication throughout the system, a throwback to an era when things moved along at a lazy pace in publishing. But it matters a lot today. Heavy on the politics, even to the detriment of work time.
Advice to Senior Management – Better communication up and down. Reward outstanding contributors to the team effort.
Your feedback has been sent to the team and we'll look into it.
Your response will be removed from the review – this cannot be undone.
No thanks –