Not yet rated.
Pros – Being in a cluster office with a small staff allowed me to work on interesting and substantive projects. I was treated like an equal staff member, and my contributions were welcome.
Cons – Sometimes the bureaucracy of a UN agency hampered making actual progress in achieving the purported goals of the organization. Furthermore, since the United States stopped making contributions in 2011, the organization has suffered and hiring numbers are down as a result. Finally, UNESCO mostly provids technical assistance, allowing contractors to do the hands-on work on the ground.
Pros – Colleagues are wonderful to work with, and in my experience were very helpful in getting me quickly acquainted with how the organization works and the hierarchies.
Cons – UNESCO is suffering greatly from funding cuts and seems to only be hiring on very short term contracts at the moment. There is no opportunity for mobility or to be hired, which is why I left.
– I'm not optimistic about the outlook for this company
Pros – the best reason that pushes me to work at UNESCO
because I have worked as a volunteer for over 10 years and I am used to the way they work.
Cons – lack of pay, lack of protection in the event of an assignment of risk, lack of office equipment, lack of means of transport.
Advice to Senior Management – Please kindly answer us a brief delays.
Pros – Started out with an internship.
Cons – Complicated bureaucracy and budget woes.
Pros – Good salary -tax free, good pension, pays for schooling of kids, not much work load, good for moms, stress free
Cons – Mundane boring work, difficult to implement new ideas, loopholes in governance, sub-standard project implementations, petty politics, flabby organization, slow pace.
Advice to Senior Management – Social organizations should try to imbibe some positives of private sector - no compromise on governance, lean organization & work towards effective project implementation. Hiring some MBAs should help in efficient project implementation.
No, I would not recommend this company to a friend
1 person found this helpful
Pros – Part of UN with potential to make a difference in the world. It has done good work to some extent on the culture front.
Cons – Most appointments are political and not transparent. Who knows who serve as criteria for career advancement. Critical thinking is not encouraged nor is merit. The organization is not really committed to social justice and the developing world. It is a self promoting mechanism for egocentric civil servants who will not bulge from its HQs.
No, I would not recommend this company to a friend
2 people found this helpful
Pros – - Great place to learn about the ins and outs of international development, gain exposure to and participate in very interesting projects that have real impact, work in multicultural teams, and have access to and work alongside upper management (both within UNESCO and at Ministries, aid agencies, etc)
- Stimulating environment if you are able to concentrate on specific projects and work closely with field offices on implementation
- Opens other doors for further employment within the field; good contacts and networking opportunities
- Great salary and benefits, exposure to diffierent cultures, opportunities to travel
Cons – - Organization is incredibly bogged down by bureaucracy; many staff have lost motiavtion
- Lack of transparency and slowness of decision-making processes from upper management
- Need to have a lot of patience, have a proactive attitude and seek the most interesting opportunities in which to be involved
- Most employment opportunities for staff are on short-term contractual bases which leads to a lot of turnover, job unsatisfaction, and difficulty to ensure sustability of projects if half of the project staff doesn't know if they will be employed
Advice to Senior Management – - Reorganization should occur at the adminsitrative level -- too many people employed to oversee bureaucratic/administrative processes to the detriment of actual project work!
- Let go of people past retirement age
- Hire people that have had a variety of experience to help the organization think outside of the box and be back on its feet...too many people with the exact same experiences that are contect to implement projects in less than innovative ways
Pros – Rewarding work and interesting colleagues
Cons – Excessive bureaucracy and slow procedures
Yes, I would recommend this company to a friend
Pros – Have credibility when dealing with outside partners
Widely considered as a good cause.
Plenty of goodwill towards the organization
Good benefits - conditions
Cons – Extremely heavy administrative procedures - culture of control, not accountability
Too much political meddling in hiring staff
Too many staff have been there too long, doing the same thing, lacking motivation, vision
Initiative is stifled
Remnants of left wing anti-private sector - anti-american attitude from earlier days, but changing with new generation.
Career advancement often a function of how much time one invests wooing the various decision-makers as opposed to carrying out one's duties effectively
Plenty of staff are tired, unmotivated
Currently in a financial crisis - many people have no budget for activities
Too many central services staff in proportion to program delivery staff.
Advice to Senior Management – Be willing to let some contracts expire and not be renewed
Find fresh blood - don't extend people past retirement age
No, I would not recommend this company to a friend – I'm not optimistic about the outlook for this company
Pros – the reasons why I work at UNESCO are multiple:
because I'm already familiar with the method of work of this organization
- I have a long experience of over 10 years with this organization in the field of human rights, culture of peace and non-violence
- I'm trained by this organization
- I'll feel free to UNESCO
Cons – disadvantages in the workplace are much lack of pay, lack of office, lack of transportation, lack of medical care
Advice to Senior Management – I can tell the senior management there is a problem of time that must be respected. I give the example to publish the winners of the culture of peace today 4 months. time must be regulated and also inform people who are in the program each time there is a change of something.
Your feedback has been sent to the team and we'll look into it.
Your response will be removed from the review – this cannot be undone.
No thanks –