Wilson Elser Reviews
Updated Dec 20, 2011 – Reviews are posted anonymously by employees.
|
Company Rating Based on 11 ratings Employees are "Dissatisfied" |
CEO Rating
Based on 4 ratings
Chairman |
See who your friends know who've worked at Wilson Elser and could give you an inside look.
See who your friends know who've worked at Wilson Elser and could help you prep for an interview.
| 1–10 of 11 Wilson Elser Reviews | Sort by |
Pros
Wilson Elser offered good salary, good benefits, and I enjoyed working with a lot of the attorneys and most of the secretaries and paralegals.
Cons
There is very little growth opportunity at Wilson Elser even though it is an international company. They didn't have any sort of career training or help further education so if you stay there, you pretty much stay where you are unless you're an attorney, in which case, you can move up the ladder.
Advice to Senior Management
It wouldn't be a bad idea to help with tuition assistance for legal secretaries. Many of them have very good legal skills on par with the paralegals and with some flexibility and monetary help, they could become great assets to the team. It would also provide better internal growth, company loyalty, and the drive that employees need to know that their hard work can help take them to the next level.
Pros
Salary, benefits, resume builder, good for those interested in insurance law.
Cons
Boring, no future in this career, morally heinous.
Pros
Courtroom experience for young lawyers
Cons
Low pay compared to similar firms
Pros
Salaries have gone up and there is a great work/life balance. There is a good chance to become partner if you prove your worth. If you are committed it can be a great place to have a career.
Cons
A large part of how many opportunities you may receive depends on which partner you work for. If you get hired into a good group you can do really well.
Pros
a lot of responsibilities; great if you like a lot of autonomy
Cons
Pay and cut throat environment
Advice to Senior Management
none
Pros
Its a salary; that's about all. You get what is required by law, but little else. Support staff is not treated respectfully.
Cons
No ability to advance; no respect. You have very little choice or say about your career. Technology is behind the times so you develop very little marketability.
Advice to Senior Management
Would be nice if they would care about support staff instead of treating them merely as pawns in filling their own pockets.
Pros
Good medical and dental benefit, good paid days off.
Cons
$100 dollar bonus for the support support and 2% percent raises. Now I ask you did i make you laugh!
Advice to Senior Management
Appreciate the support staff more!
Pros
Good for families/personal time balance depending on group.
Cons
Zero feedback, little support or guidance.
Pros
The billable requirements are not overbearing (1900). Depending on which group you are assigned to, you are given a lot of independence. Most associates and partners are willing to answer your questions and provide guidance.
Cons
The pay is paltry. The firm holds itself out as a "biglaw" firm, but the practice groups are very limited, and the pay is half of that offered at "biglaw" firms.
Advice to Senior Management
None.
Pros
You can get a lot of courtroom experience quickly, getting you out of the office. For insurance defense, they pay in the top tier.
Cons
Becoming an equity partner is very difficult as the partners fight over credit for work, even when you bring it into the firm. There is no training or formal mentoring program as young associates are "thrown into the fire." The endless push for more billable hours is a drain as you see the salary pale in comparison to BigLaw billing the same number of hours.
Advice to Senior Management
There needs to be better communication between the main office and the satellite offices and there should be a formal mentoring program for younger attorneys. Lastly, associates need to work towards something and the obstacles to just even making a contract partner (4 years with the firm, 9 years total as a minimum) is often short-sighted. Associates who bring in business should be rewarded and allowing a partner to take credit for a national client when he/she played no role in that client sending cases to another office is ridiculous.
