Does A Difficult Interview Mean A Less Enjoyable Workplace?

Your hands are clammy and your heart is racing as you progress through the the job interview gauntlet at a particular company. One interviewer blends into the next, and the questions vary from the ever-popular, “What are your strengths and weaknesses?” to “How many cups of coffee do people in London drink per day?”

It doesn’t help that recent job reports show fewer jobs being added to the economy, which means that companies are being more stringent than ever in the interview process, and that the competition for open positions will continue to be fierce.  And, let’s face it, some interviews are tougher than others. But, does a difficult interview directly correlate to a difficult job or an unpleasant work experience?

Glassdoor dug into the interview reviews shared by job candidates throughout the past year to find out what companies have the most difficult interview processes and what employees at those companies say it’s really like to work there. We’ve uncovered the top 20 most difficult companies for interviews, and how they rate for those who actually get the job.

Highlights:

  • Toughest Interview Process: McKinsey & Company (Interview Difficulty: 3.9), Jane Street Capital (Interview Difficulty: 3.7) and Cree (Interview Difficulty: 3.7) have the most difficult interview process according to recent job candidates. ¹
  • Difficult Interview, but High Employee Satisfaction: While the companies that make this list have reportedly difficult interview processes, there are several where employees are satisfied, including: McKinsey & Company (Interview Difficulty: 3.9; Company Rating: 3.9), Bain & Company (Interview Difficulty: 3.6; Company Rating: 4.2), Boston Consulting (Interview Difficulty: 3.6; Company Rating: 4.0) and Procter & Gamble (Interview Difficulty: 3.4; Company Rating: 3.7).
  • Difficult Interview, Positive Experience: Despite a tough interview, a majority of candidates at several of these companies report a positive interview experience; 72% of Oliver Wyman candidates report a positive experience, 69% of Procter & Gamble candidates, 64% of McKinsey & Company candidates and 64% of Teach for America candidates.
  • For most companies on this list, the positive interview experience ratings outweigh the negative. However eBay and Cree have higher negative interview experience ratings than positive; (eBay: 25% positive, 45% negative; Cree: 19% positive, 42% negative) – that said both companies receive ‘OK’ company ratings from employees.

What’s your take? Have you a tough interview that turned out to be a great job or vice versa? Share your interview review on Glassdoor and tell future job candidates what they would have seen and heard if they were a fly on the wall in your interview.

¹ Company and interview reviews are based on a 5-point scale; Company ratings: 5.0 = very satisfied, 1.0 = very dissatisfied; Interview difficulty ratings: 5.0 = very difficult, 1.0 = very easy.

The Glassdoor Team is a small yet seasoned group of individuals looking to provide greater transparency into one of the most important aspects of our lives – our jobs. Contributions to the blog are designed to present a unique perspective on current events, offer commentary on the inside workings on specific jobs at a multitude of companies, and provide details on the latest happenings from within Glassdoor.

  • Guest

    Great post. This has been on my mind quite a bit lately. I think the interviews where they're trying to make me sweat or see how I handle the pressure or test how I respond to mid-interview rejection have turned out to be the least satisfying jobs. That type of testing seems to reflect insecurities and power plays that seep into the job experience and show that leadership wants to dominate and control, not nurture and grow.

  • Sam

    You should do this same survey for Federal employment. By far the worst place I have ever interviewed for was The Federal Reserve. I have interviewed with them
    3 different times. I have had several friends interview with them
    as well telling similiar stories. All the interviewers were anti-social and did not
    know how to effectively ask a question that pertained to what they wanted to
    know. They asked point questions to understand your political motivations to see how
    you would comply. I had wanted to work there for so long and after the interviews. I am glad I never got a job with them. Based on how they interview I don't see how they could effectively motivate and manage employees.

  • Gentrich

    Southern California Edison (Edison International) should be on your list of difficult interviews.  I've read and have talked to many Edison employees and for the most part they are satisfied with their jobs, pay, hrs., benies, and their surroundings at Edison.  One of the key pluses is work life balance.  With that said, I sent my resume and application to them in January for an IT supervisor position, they called me in April.  I had two phone interviews, two live interviews (all by a group of department heads), and one all day leadership assesment evaluation – a day in the life of… case study (I signed a non disclosure agreement, I can't say more).  My experience was positive, but the waiting was excruciating, the process not including having have sent my resume took over 4 months!  Out of hundreds of candidates they narrowed it down to 4.  They had congratulated me for having have made it “this far,” the final 4. But at the end of the day, they choose one of the other 3.  It was a total let down to have to start with square one again with them.  I like the company and I will eventually work there.