Job Seekers: Don’t Let HR Drop The Ball

Human resource departments across the country are dropping the ball, creating a “talent crisis” in finance, information technology, procurement and other business areas, according to a new report by The Hackett Group, the business advisory company.

Through its research The Hackett Group found businesses say they are getting support from HR in managing employees less than 35% of the time on average and that HR is providing a full range of services only 13% or less of the time. The study looked at six areas of so-called talent management including workforce planning and succession; collaboration, retention, performance management, learning and development and recruiting and staffing.

“Companies aren’t satisfied with the support HR is providing,” says John Cooper, Associate Principal, HR Advisory Program Leader at The Hackett Group. “HR is being squeezed. They haven’t had the budget to do these things.”  Companies are equally guilty of not engaging in long term planning and not focusing on developing employees, he says.

According to the report in areas like retention and collaboration/knowledge-sharing 18% or fewer companies in the study gave HR departments credit for providing enough service and expertise. In workforce planning, performance management and learning and development 33% to 47% of companies said they were getting adequate levels of support.

For companies, this lack of effort on the part of the HR department for whatever reason means that if something doesn’t change, the business will have a hard time finding the right talent and keeping them there. According to Cooper in order for companies to land lasting talent they need to have a clear idea of what skills and experience they are looking for and they have to engage in workforce planning in which they figure out what they want out of their employees in the next five years.  What’s more HR departments need to rely less on labor markets outside the company and develop the existing staff. Another option, hiring less experienced people that have the potential to be developed.

Once the employee is hired the company needs to develop and invest in the talent so he or she can improve and grow. “HR has to take a more aggressive stance in spearheading this,” says Cooper. “HR departments can’t go get more money. They have to become more productive.”

For the job seeker, this lack of support by HR departments means they need to be more critical of the job they take. “From the job seeker point of view it behooves them to really look beyond the immediate need to score a job and ask questions around what the company does to develop people’s career path,” says Cooper. For instance he says job candidates need to inquire about how the company integrates performance and career development and ask what the career ladder entails.

“Ask for real world examples of people starting where you are and moving up and find out what happened to them,” says Cooper.  If the company can’t answer any of those questions, then it sends a clear message that not much thought is put into an employee’s future. If you do decide to take the job, take it as a way to get experience or a stepping stone to eventually getting a job where you can grow, he says.

Improving the talent companies are landing not only saves it the headache of finding a replacement but it also boosts productivity, which in turn will increase revenue and net income.  “It reduces a whole heap of costs that happen because of constant turnover,” says Cooper. He pointed to a Canadian client that had turn-over rates of 50% in its call centers. It cost the company between $700,000 to $1 million a day as a result.

Given the “talent crisis,” job seekers are in a unique position to stand out when it comes to landing a job as long as they possess more than the skills listed in the job description.  “It’s not enough to be the consummate IT, finance or HR professional,” says Cooper. Instead you have to have the ability to solve problems and analyze situations. “There’s big push toward those higher order skills that go well beyond just the core functions,” he says.

Donna Fuscaldo is a freelance journalist hailing out of Long Island, New York. Donna writes for numerous online publications including FoxBusiness.com, Bankrate.com, AARP.com, Insurance.com and Houselogic.com. As a personal finance reporter for years, Donna provides invaluable advice on everything from saving money to landing that dream job. She also writes a weekly column for FoxBusiness.com focused on technology for small businesses. Previously, Donna was an equities reporter for Dow Jones Newswires and a special contributor to the Wall Street Journal. Through the Glassdoor Blog, Donna will provide tips on how to find a job and more importantly keep it.

  • i’mjustsayin’

    I am sadly underwhelmed by the laziness and lack of professionalism I have experienced when dealing with HR in job searches. There is so much written about how the candidate should be prepared, punctual, courteous yet HR people are often late, don’t follow up, leave you hanging and don’t really understand the position they are screening for. How can you wow someone who doesn’t even get the nuances of the job? This is the companies’ fault..not hiring experienced people..hiring screeners who have had minimal work experience..or outsourcing that…. having five rounds of interviews for a 50K job which is total overkill. Maybe when companies are smarter about who they delegate screening and interviewing to.. there won’t be a “talent crisis”. There are plenty of great people out there…

  • Worx92

    They want to create a void, so they can say they can’t find any qualified Americans and hire foreigners cheaper.
    These HR departments aren’t clueless, they know what they are doing.
    No one needs HR anymore and their bag of tricks stupid questions. Asking someone what their favorite colors or “Tell me about a time when…” Oh please. There WAS a time when they wanted to know if YOU could DO the job. They didn’t care what your hobbies were.
    HR departments claim they have to have software screen applicants. That’s why they are screening everyone out. Why don’t companies just save themselves a lot of money and not have HR departments? One of the best places I ever worked didn’t have one. They outsourced their benefits to a local benefit plan provider, and payroll was done by another company. Tah dah! Oh, and managers did the hiring, because they knew what they wanted. Not some HR person with no clue what your job entails.

    Didn’t have to sit through an “Orientation” with HR clerks and department heads each getting up and boring the pants off us. My gosh, these people are so full of themselves, so important. But they don’t lend to any productivity with a company. Why have them?

  • Cheated

    I completely understand what you are saying! It’s like we as job seekers are expected to wait for months to get through the ‘process’, be available between 9am and 2pm everyday, and literally be willing to evolve with the job requirements as they change them! But NOTHING bothers me more than the recruiter not bothering to at least inform you that the position has been filled, leaving you hanging for atleast a week, so that you make your own assumptions. I could go on, but I won’t. I just feel cheated.