Compare Genentech vs Gilead Sciences BETA

See how Gilead Sciences vs. Genentech compare on employee ratings, job openings, CEO approval, business outlook and more.

Employee Ratings

Overall Rating
(full-time and part-time employees only)
3.9
(based on 1947 reviews)
2.9
(based on 734 reviews)
Career Opportunities
3.3
2.7
Compensation & Benefits
4.2
3.8
Work-life balance
3.8
2.6
Senior Management
3.2
2.5
Culture & Values
3.8
2.9
CEO Approval
Genentech Ceo Alexander Hardy
88%Alexander Hardy
Gilead Sciences Ceo Daniel O’Day
78%Daniel O’Day
% Recommend to a friend
74%
44%
Positive Business Outlook
51%
32%

Salaries

Salaries for similar jobs
Research Associate196 Salaries
$85,425/yr
Intern143 Salaries
$23/hr
Associate Director57 Salaries
$205,110/yr
Research Scientist27 Salaries
$130,445/yr
Intern - Hourly23 Salaries
$26/hr
Senior Manager38 Salaries
$164,144/yr

What Employees Say

Pros
"Great benefits"(in 230 reviews)
"Work life balance"(in 199 reviews)
"Great benefits"(in 52 reviews)
"Good benefits"(in 40 reviews)
Cons
"Work life balance"(in 109 reviews)
"Full time"(in 100 reviews)
"Work life balance"(in 126 reviews)
"Upper management"(in 38 reviews)
Featured Review

Current Employee - Anonymous Employee

I have been working at Genentech full-time for more than 3 years

Pros

Competitive Pay Great benefits Awards Great Work life balance that promotes working from home team engagement events able to travel visibility a lot of development opportunities Be able to... help others Our give back to the community events

Cons

I have none at this time.

Advice to Management

Keep up the good work

"Great company"Mar 3, 2019

Current Employee - Senior Director

I have been working at Gilead Sciences full-time for more than 5 years

Pros

A company with an inspiring mission and incredible track record of developing products that transform patients lives and impact public health.

Cons

Going through a period of organisational and senior management change having not seen its strongest period of growth.

Advice to Management

Focus more on good people management and development opportunities for staff. Less of a focus on inclusion initiatives that achieve the opposite.

Job Postings