Compare General Atomics vs Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton BETA

See how Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton vs. General Atomics compare on employee ratings, job openings, CEO approval, business outlook and more.

Employee Ratings

Overall Rating
(full-time and part-time employees only)
3.7
(based on 743 reviews)
2.8
(based on 72 reviews)
Career Opportunities
3.4
2.6
Compensation & Benefits
3.8
3.4
Work-life balance
3.7
3.1
Senior Management
3.0
2.4
Culture & Values
3.3
2.7
CEO Approval
General Atomics Ceo Neal Blue
87%Neal Blue
Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton Ceo Henry Walker
49%Henry Walker
% Recommend to a friend
76%
34%
Positive Business Outlook
57%
26%

Salaries

Salaries for similar jobs
Project Engineer34 Salaries
$110,807/yr
Project Manager23 Salaries
$92,948/yr
Intern - Hourly16 Salaries
$24/hr
Patent Engineer/Scientist1 Salaries
$156,049/yr
EDiscovery Project Manager1 Salaries
$101,609/yr
Staff2 Salaries
$56,438/yr

What Employees Say

Pros
"9 80 work"(in 93 reviews)
"Great benefits"(in 69 reviews)
"Great benefits"(in 4 reviews)
"Great place"(in 4 reviews)
Cons
"Military"(in 25 reviews)
"Growing pains"(in 16 reviews)
"Work life balance"(in 4 reviews)
"Long hours"(in 4 reviews)
Featured Review
"GA-EMS"Jun 2, 2019

Current Employee - Anonymous Employee

I have been working at General Atomics full-time for more than 3 years

Pros

Flexible work hours, challenging work, opportunities for growth

Cons

They can’t seem to hire fast enough for the companies growth.

I worked at Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton

Pros

I worked in the Menlo Park office. The attorneys and professional staff were nice. There were nice social events and free snacks at work. Menlo Park is mostly IP.

Cons

Hard to advance, but that is true of most law firms

Job Postings