Compare Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory vs MIT Lincoln Laboratory BETA

See how working at Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory vs. MIT Lincoln Laboratory compares on a variety of workplace factors. By comparing employers on employee ratings, salaries, reviews, pros/cons, job openings and more, you'll feel one step ahead of the rest. All salaries and reviews are posted by employees working at Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory vs. MIT Lincoln Laboratory. Learn more about each company and apply to jobs near you.
Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory company icon

Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory

Employee Ratings

  • Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory scored higher in 9 areas: Overall Rating, Career Opportunities, Compensation & Benefits, Work-life balance, Senior Management, Culture & Values, CEO Approval, % Recommend to a friend and Positive Business Outlook.
Overall Rating
(full-time and part-time employees only)
Overall Rating
(full-time and part-time employees only)
4.7
(based on 482 reviews)
Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory employees rated their Overall Rating 0.6 higher than MIT Lincoln Laboratory employees rated theirs.
Overall Rating
(full-time and part-time employees only)
4.1
(based on 287 reviews)
Career Opportunities
Career Opportunities
4.5
Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory employees rated their Career Opportunities 0.8 higher than MIT Lincoln Laboratory employees rated theirs.
Career Opportunities
3.7
Compensation & Benefits
Compensation & Benefits
4.5
Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory employees rated their Compensation & Benefits 0.8 higher than MIT Lincoln Laboratory employees rated theirs.
Compensation & Benefits
3.7
Work-life balance
Work-life balance
4.7
Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory employees rated their Work-life balance 0.3 higher than MIT Lincoln Laboratory employees rated theirs.
Work-life balance
4.4
Senior Management
Senior Management
4.2
Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory employees rated their Senior Management 0.5 higher than MIT Lincoln Laboratory employees rated theirs.
Senior Management
3.7
Culture & Values
Culture & Values
4.6
Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory employees rated their Culture & Values 0.5 higher than MIT Lincoln Laboratory employees rated theirs.
Culture & Values
4.1
CEO Approval
CEO Approval
Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory Ceo Dr. Ralph Semmel
98%
98%Dr. Ralph Semmel
Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory employees rated their CEO Approval 3% higher than MIT Lincoln Laboratory employees rated theirs.
CEO Approval
MIT Lincoln Laboratory Ceo Eric Evans
95%
95%Eric Evans
% Recommend to a friend
% Recommend to a friend
98%
Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory employees rated their % Recommend to a friend 18% higher than MIT Lincoln Laboratory employees rated theirs.
% Recommend to a friend
80%
Positive Business Outlook
Positive Business Outlook
93%
Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory employees rated their Positive Business Outlook 13% higher than MIT Lincoln Laboratory employees rated theirs.
Positive Business Outlook
80%

Salaries

Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory has 257 more total submitted salaries than MIT Lincoln Laboratory.
Salaries for similar jobs
Salaries for similar jobs
Associate Professional Staff I387 Salaries
$119,070/yr
Technical Aide24 Salaries
$29/hr
Intern56 Salaries
$27/hr
Salaries for similar jobs
Assistant Group Leader5 Salaries
$200,322/yr
Technical Staff303 Salaries
$124,533/yr
Associate Staff46 Salaries
$105,295/yr

What Employees Say

  • Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory had 13 more reviews than MIT Lincoln Laboratory that mentioned "Work life balance" as a Pro.
  • "Red tape" was the most mentioned Con at Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory.
  • "Technical staff" was the most mentioned Con at MIT Lincoln Laboratory.
Pros
Pros
"Work life balance"(in 66 reviews)
"Great benefits"(in 40 reviews)
Pros
"Work life balance"(in 53 reviews)
"Interesting work"(in 33 reviews)
Cons
Cons
"Red tape"(in 13 reviews)
"Baltimore"(in 10 reviews)
Cons
"Technical staff"(in 12 reviews)
"Group leaders"(in 12 reviews)
Featured Review
"Great Place"Jan 10, 2021

Current Employee - Senior Staff Software Engineer

I have been working at Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory full-time

Pros

Great Place To Be An Engineer

Cons

No cons at all, best place to be

Former Employee - Associate Staff

I worked at MIT Lincoln Laboratory full-time for more than 3 years

Pros

Flexible Schedule, Great Benefits, Highly Skilled Workforce

Cons

No performance incentives, slightly below industry average salary

Job Postings

Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory has 267 more recently posted open jobs than MIT Lincoln Laboratory.