Compare Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory vs MIT Lincoln Laboratory BETA

See how MIT Lincoln Laboratory vs. Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory compare on employee ratings, job openings, CEO approval, business outlook and more.

Employee Ratings

Overall Rating
(full-time and part-time employees only)
4.5
(based on 405 reviews)
3.9
(based on 245 reviews)
Career Opportunities
4.5
3.9
Compensation & Benefits
4.3
3.9
Work-life balance
4.7
4.1
Senior Management
3.9
3.2
Culture & Values
4.3
3.8
CEO Approval
Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory Ceo Dr. Ralph Semmel
94%Dr. Ralph Semmel
MIT Lincoln Laboratory Ceo Eric Evans
91%Eric Evans
% Recommend to a friend
94%
77%
Positive Business Outlook
90%
64%

Salaries

Salaries for similar jobs
Senior Professional Staff I70 Salaries
$123,311/yr
Systems Engineer10 Salaries
$116,699/yr
Associate Professional Staff Member II6 Salaries
$99,996/yr
Intern - Hourly32 Salaries
$25/hr
Technical Staff84 Salaries
$132,991/yr
Summer Research47 Salaries
$25/hr

What Employees Say

Pros
"Work life balance"(in 58 reviews)
"Great benefits"(in 36 reviews)
"Work life balance"(in 49 reviews)
"Smart people"(in 33 reviews)
Cons
"Red tape"(in 11 reviews)
"Matrix organization"(in 9 reviews)
"Group leaders"(in 12 reviews)
"Technical staff"(in 11 reviews)
Featured Review

Current Employee - Associate Professional Staff II

I have been working at Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory full-time for more than 5 years

Pros

Extensive internal funding for staff startup projects Management challenges staff to push for continuous improvement Flexible work-life balance

Cons

Parking Office space is getting crowded

Former Employee - Assistant Staff

I worked at MIT Lincoln Laboratory full-time for more than 3 years

Pros

Freedom of an academic environment without the pressure to publish or find grants. Great group leaders that encourage staff growth and side projects.

Cons

Can be a bit slow-moving like its government customers.

Job Postings