Compare Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory vs MIT Lincoln Laboratory BETA
See how MIT Lincoln Laboratory vs. Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory compare on employee ratings, job openings, CEO approval, business outlook and more.Employee Ratings
Overall Rating
(full-time and part-time employees only)
(based on 405 reviews)
(based on 245 reviews)
Career Opportunities
Compensation & Benefits
Work-life balance
Senior Management
Culture & Values
CEO Approval
94%Dr. Ralph Semmel
91%Eric Evans
% Recommend to a friend
Positive Business Outlook
Salaries
Salaries for similar jobs
Senior Professional Staff I70 Salaries
$123,311/yr
Systems Engineer10 Salaries
$116,699/yr
Associate Professional Staff Member II6 Salaries
$99,996/yr
Intern - Hourly32 Salaries
$25/hr
Technical Staff84 Salaries
$132,991/yr
Summer Research47 Salaries
$25/hr
What Employees Say
Pros
"Work life balance"(in 58 reviews)
"Great benefits"(in 36 reviews)
"Work life balance"(in 49 reviews)
"Smart people"(in 33 reviews)
Cons
"Red tape"(in 11 reviews)
"Matrix organization"(in 9 reviews)
"Group leaders"(in 12 reviews)
"Technical staff"(in 11 reviews)
Featured Review
"Fantastic Culture of Continuous Improvement"Oct 11, 2019
I have been working at Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory full-time for more than 5 years
Pros
Extensive internal funding for staff startup projects Management challenges staff to push for continuous improvement Flexible work-life balance
Cons
Parking Office space is getting crowded
"Great place to work!"Mar 18, 2019
I worked at MIT Lincoln Laboratory full-time for more than 3 years
Pros
Freedom of an academic environment without the pressure to publish or find grants. Great group leaders that encourage staff growth and side projects.
Cons
Can be a bit slow-moving like its government customers.