Compare Marsh & McLennan Companies vs Mercer BETA

See how working at Marsh & McLennan Companies vs. Mercer compares on a variety of workplace factors. By comparing employers on employee ratings, salaries, reviews, pros/cons, job openings and more, you'll feel one step ahead of the rest. All salaries and reviews are posted by employees working at Marsh & McLennan Companies vs. Mercer. Learn more about each company and apply to jobs near you.

Marsh & McLennan Companies

Mercer

Employee Ratings

Marsh & McLennan Companies scored higher in 5 areas: Compensation & Benefits, Senior Management, CEO Approval, % Recommend to a friend and Positive Business Outlook.
Mercer scored higher in 2 areas: Career Opportunities and Culture & Values.
Both tied in 2 areas: Overall Rating and Work-life balance.

Overall Rating

(full-time and part-time employees only)

Overall Rating

(full-time and part-time employees only)

3.5

★★★★★

(based on 941 reviews)

Overall Rating

(full-time and part-time employees only)

3.5

★★★★★

(based on 2925 reviews)

Career Opportunities

3.2

★★★★★

Career Opportunities

3.3

★★★★★

Compensation & Benefits

3.4

★★★★★

Marsh & McLennan Companies employees rated their Compensation & Benefits 0.3 higher than Mercer employees rated theirs.

Compensation & Benefits

3.1

★★★★★

Work-life balance

3.5

★★★★★

Work-life balance

3.5

★★★★★

Senior Management

3.1

★★★★★

Senior Management

3.0

★★★★★

Culture & Values

3.4

★★★★★

Culture & Values

3.5

★★★★★

CEO Approval

88%

88%Daniel S. Glaser

Marsh & McLennan Companies employees rated their CEO Approval 4% higher than Mercer employees rated theirs.

CEO Approval

84%

84%Martine Ferland

% Recommend to a friend

69%

% Recommend to a friend

67%

Positive Business Outlook

63%

Marsh & McLennan Companies employees rated their Positive Business Outlook 15% higher than Mercer employees rated theirs.

Positive Business Outlook

48%

Salaries

Mercer has 1,005 more total submitted salaries than Marsh & McLennan Companies.

Salaries for similar jobs

TRAC Associate32 Salaries

$66,049/yr

Insurance Specialist25 Salaries

$62,611/yr

Client Manager26 Salaries

$85,476/yr

See more Marsh & McLennan Companies salaries (2410)

Salaries for similar jobs

Senior Associate232 Salaries

$106,737/yr

Actuarial Analyst152 Salaries

$71,169/yr

Client Service Analyst56 Salaries

$50,165/yr

See more Mercer salaries (3415)

What Employees Say

Mercer had 276 more reviews than Marsh & McLennan Companies that mentioned "Work life balance" as a Pro.
Mercer had 139 more reviews than Marsh & McLennan Companies that mentioned "Work life balance" as a Con.

Pros

"Work life balance"(in 60 reviews)

"Great benefits"(in 45 reviews)

Pros

"Work life balance"(in 336 reviews)

"Work environment"(in 165 reviews)

Cons

"Work life balance"(in 33 reviews)

"Senior management"(in 27 reviews)

Cons

"Work life balance"(in 172 reviews)

"Long hours"(in 84 reviews)

Read Marsh & McLennan Companies reviews

Read Mercer reviews

Featured Review

"Amazing work environment"Aug 18, 2020

★★★★★

Former Intern - Summer Associate

I worked at Marsh & McLennan Companies

Pros

Great work/life balance Very kind managers Dedicated to helping you rise through the ranks of the company

Cons

Can be monotonous Not very challenging

"Excellent Internship"Sep 2, 2020

★★★★★

Current Intern - Actuarial Intern

I have been working at Mercer for less than a year

Pros

I interned in the health line of business. Would highly recommend; internship was educational, fun, and highly rewarding. I was able to do the work of a full time analyst, see projects through from... beginning to end, and send decks that I'd assembled directly to clients.

Cons

Working in employee benefits means less exposure to broader actuarial functions.

Job Postings

Marsh & McLennan Companies has 112 more recently posted open jobs than Mercer.