Compare Merck vs College of American Pathologists BETA

See how College of American Pathologists vs. Merck compare on employee ratings, job openings, CEO approval, business outlook and more.

Employee Ratings

Overall Rating
(full-time and part-time employees only)
3.8
(based on 3282 reviews)
3.0
(based on 61 reviews)
Career Opportunities
3.4
2.8
Compensation & Benefits
4.0
3.6
Work-life balance
3.7
3.5
Senior Management
3.1
2.7
Culture & Values
3.7
3.1
CEO Approval
Merck Ceo Kenneth C. Frazier
88%Kenneth C. Frazier
College of American Pathologists Ceo Stephen Myers
82%Stephen Myers
% Recommend to a friend
81%
64%
Positive Business Outlook
66%
60%

Salaries

Salaries for similar jobs
Senior Scientist236 Salaries
$111,622/yr
Associate Director148 Salaries
$140,843/yr
Associate Principal Scientist136 Salaries
$127,887/yr
Systems Analyst-specialist3 Salaries
$103,335/yr
Director8 Salaries
$153,809/yr
Summer2 Salaries
$11/hr

What Employees Say

Pros
"Work life balance"(in 283 reviews)
"Good benefits"(in 198 reviews)
"Good benefits"(in 7 reviews)
"Flexible work"(in 6 reviews)
Cons
"Work life balance"(in 89 reviews)
"Upper management"(in 87 reviews)
"Top heavy"(in 3 reviews)
"Higher level"(in 2 reviews)
Featured Review

Former Intern - Internship

I worked at Merck for less than a year

Pros

Flexibility Compensation Networking Transparency All around friendly and positive culture

Cons

Location Can be slow depending on role

Current Employee - Anonymous Employee

I have been working at College of American Pathologists full-time for more than 3 years

Pros

The CAP has a set of staff values that describe how employees must work together. It feels pretty collaborative and respectful, versus the dog-eat-dog culture of the corporate world. While they... look to grow revenue, the business model and success in the lab space provides a pretty stable environment for people who are fed up with the ups and downs of a profit focused industry. The "mission" gives even staff without medical backgrounds a chance to contribute to improved patient care. It's technically a non-profit but you get to work on the projects and improvements that you would work on within most for profit companies. Pay is what you'd expect to find at a for profit but the benefits are much better. Cool building to work in and a lot of flexible work options that make life easier for working parents. There are a lot of internal training options but it seems like their focus has really been on improving managers.

Cons

I don't know why but it seems like managers are more likely to share positive feedback than constructive feedback. Leaves you with a feeling that you never really know what kind of performance... rating to expect. There are a lot of meetings and this doesn't allow for much time to think or even do work! Process for decisions feels like it slows down progress. Feels like everything needs to be presented formally to the top leadership or a group of people that decide which projects get the green light.

Advice to Management

Improve technology, procurement process, and prioritization. Let staff or management make some decisions. Tell me how you really think I'm doing, both good and bad.

Job Postings