Compare Merck vs Deaconess BETA

See how Deaconess vs. Merck compare on employee ratings, job openings, CEO approval, business outlook and more.

Employee Ratings

Overall Rating
(full-time and part-time employees only)
3.8
(based on 3282 reviews)
3.9
(based on 117 reviews)
Career Opportunities
3.4
3.6
Compensation & Benefits
4.0
3.7
Work-life balance
3.7
3.6
Senior Management
3.1
3.4
Culture & Values
3.7
3.7
CEO Approval
Merck Ceo Kenneth C. Frazier
88%Kenneth C. Frazier
Deaconess Ceo Linda E. White
98%Linda E. White
% Recommend to a friend
81%
78%
Positive Business Outlook
66%
63%

Salaries

Salaries for similar jobs
Senior Scientist236 Salaries
$111,622/yr
Associate Director148 Salaries
$140,843/yr
Associate Principal Scientist136 Salaries
$127,887/yr
Applications Analyst2 Salaries
$57,862/yr
Department Manager1 Salaries
$46/hr
Indiana1 Salaries
$26/hr

What Employees Say

Pros
"Work life balance"(in 283 reviews)
"Good benefits"(in 198 reviews)
"Great benefits"(in 9 reviews)
"Physicians"(in 6 reviews)
Cons
"Work life balance"(in 89 reviews)
"Upper management"(in 87 reviews)
"Upper management"(in 3 reviews)
"Short staffed"(in 3 reviews)
Featured Review

Current Employee - Anonymous Employee

I have been working at Merck full-time for less than a year

Pros

Respectful environment, clear vision and direction as an organization. Limitless opportunities for personal and professional growth. Competitive pay and benefits.

Cons

Limited overtime pay for salary positions

Advice to Management

Keep up the good work.

Current Employee - CMA

I have been working at Deaconess full-time for more than 3 years

Pros

Decent pay, flexible schedule and plenty of opportunities

Cons

Lacking of communication from upper management down through chain of command

Job Postings