Compare Merck vs GlaxoSmithKline BETA

See how GlaxoSmithKline vs. Merck compare on employee ratings, job openings, CEO approval, business outlook and more.

Employee Ratings

Overall Rating
(full-time and part-time employees only)
3.8
(based on 3287 reviews)
3.9
(based on 4427 reviews)
Career Opportunities
3.3
3.4
Compensation & Benefits
4.0
3.9
Work-life balance
3.7
3.8
Senior Management
3.1
3.2
Culture & Values
3.7
3.9
CEO Approval
Merck Ceo Kenneth C. Frazier
88%Kenneth C. Frazier
GlaxoSmithKline Ceo Emma Walmsley
86%Emma Walmsley
% Recommend to a friend
80%
78%
Positive Business Outlook
65%
56%

Salaries

Salaries for similar jobs
Senior Scientist236 Salaries
$111,252/yr
Associate Director148 Salaries
$140,843/yr
Associate Principal Scientist136 Salaries
$127,887/yr
Investigator109 Salaries
$108,754/yr
Director60 Salaries
$178,949/yr
Intern22 Salaries
$23/hr

What Employees Say

Pros
"Work life balance"(in 284 reviews)
"Good benefits"(in 198 reviews)
"Work life balance"(in 447 reviews)
"Work environment"(in 289 reviews)
Cons
"Work life balance"(in 89 reviews)
"Upper management"(in 87 reviews)
"Work life balance"(in 111 reviews)
"Decision making"(in 103 reviews)
Featured Review

Former Intern - Antibody Engineer

I worked at Merck

Pros

great people to work with many opportunities to network with people in your department many seminars to learn about updates on MERCK

Cons

there were no cons working here

"Sales rep"Jul 21, 2019

Current Employee - Anonymous Employee

I have been working at GlaxoSmithKline full-time

Pros

Culture and pay are good

Cons

Not competitive to other companies

Job Postings