Compare Northrop Grumman vs Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory BETA

See how Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory vs. Northrop Grumman compare on employee ratings, job openings, CEO approval, business outlook and more.

Employee Ratings

Overall Rating
(full-time and part-time employees only)
3.7
(based on 4597 reviews)
4.5
(based on 405 reviews)
Career Opportunities
3.5
4.4
Compensation & Benefits
3.7
4.3
Work-life balance
3.7
4.7
Senior Management
3.1
3.9
Culture & Values
3.6
4.3
CEO Approval
Northrop Grumman Ceo Kathy Warden
88%Kathy Warden
Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory Ceo Dr. Ralph Semmel
94%Dr. Ralph Semmel
% Recommend to a friend
70%
94%
Positive Business Outlook
65%
91%

Salaries

Salaries for similar jobs
Software Engineer265 Salaries
$79,397/yr
Systems Engineer247 Salaries
$90,817/yr
Intern - Hourly128 Salaries
$23/hr
Software Engineer30 Salaries
$98,501/yr
Systems Engineer10 Salaries
$116,699/yr
Senior Professional Staff I70 Salaries
$123,311/yr

What Employees Say

Pros
"9 80 schedule"(in 368 reviews)
"Work life balance"(in 348 reviews)
"Work life balance"(in 58 reviews)
"Great benefits"(in 36 reviews)
Cons
"Upper management"(in 124 reviews)
"Large company"(in 104 reviews)
"Red tape"(in 11 reviews)
"Matrix organization"(in 9 reviews)
Featured Review

Current Employee - UAV Operator

I have been working at Northrop Grumman full-time for less than a year

Pros

Meaningful work. Good pay. Good management. Do-right attitude.

Cons

Occasional long hours and weekends. Not a huge draw back because of rewarding work.

Current Employee - Associate Professional Staff II

I have been working at Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory full-time for more than 5 years

Pros

Extensive internal funding for staff startup projects Management challenges staff to push for continuous improvement Flexible work-life balance

Cons

Parking Office space is getting crowded

Job Postings