Compare Northrop Grumman vs Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory BETA

See how working at Northrop Grumman vs. Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory compares on a variety of workplace factors. By comparing employers on employee ratings, salaries, reviews, pros/cons, job openings and more, you'll feel one step ahead of the rest. All salaries and reviews are posted by employees working at Northrop Grumman vs. Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory. Learn more about each company and apply to jobs near you.

Northrop Grumman

Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory

Employee Ratings

Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory scored higher in 7 areas: Overall Rating, Career Opportunities, Compensation & Benefits, Work-life balance, Senior Management, Culture & Values and CEO Approval.
Both tied in 2 areas: % Recommend to a friend and Positive Business Outlook.

Overall Rating

(full-time and part-time employees only)

Overall Rating

(full-time and part-time employees only)

4.0

★★★★★

(based on 7973 reviews)

Overall Rating

(full-time and part-time employees only)

4.3

★★★★★

(based on 701 reviews)

Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory employees rated their Overall Rating 0.3 higher than Northrop Grumman employees rated theirs.

Career Opportunities

3.9

★★★★★

Career Opportunities

4.2

★★★★★

Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory employees rated their Career Opportunities 0.3 higher than Northrop Grumman employees rated theirs.

Compensation & Benefits

3.8

★★★★★

Compensation & Benefits

4.2

★★★★★

Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory employees rated their Compensation & Benefits 0.4 higher than Northrop Grumman employees rated theirs.

Work-life balance

4.0

★★★★★

Work-life balance

4.4

★★★★★

Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory employees rated their Work-life balance 0.4 higher than Northrop Grumman employees rated theirs.

Senior Management

3.4

★★★★★

Senior Management

3.7

★★★★★

Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory employees rated their Senior Management 0.3 higher than Northrop Grumman employees rated theirs.

Culture & Values

3.8

★★★★★

Culture & Values

4.1

★★★★★

Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory employees rated their Culture & Values 0.3 higher than Northrop Grumman employees rated theirs.

CEO Approval

81%

81%Kathy Warden

CEO Approval

85%

85%Dr. Ralph Semmel

Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory employees rated their CEO Approval 4% higher than Northrop Grumman employees rated theirs.

% Recommend to a friend

81%

% Recommend to a friend

81%

Positive Business Outlook

74%

Positive Business Outlook

74%

Salaries

Of the top 3 common jobs between the two companies, Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory salaries averaged $14,490 higher than Northrop Grumman.

Salaries for similar jobs

Software Engineer825 Salaries

$93,594/yr

Systems Engineer752 Salaries

$96,810/yr

Intern211 Salaries

$26/hr

See more Northrop Grumman salaries (21939)

Salaries for similar jobs

Software Engineer102 Salaries

$111,005/yr

Systems Engineer37 Salaries

$122,868/yr

Intern74 Salaries

$29/hr

See more Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory salaries (1968)

What Employees Say

Northrop Grumman had 608 more reviews than Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory that mentioned "Work life balance" as a Pro.
"Large company" was the most mentioned Con at Northrop Grumman.
"Red tape" was the most mentioned Con at Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory.

Pros

"Work life balance"(in 691 reviews)

"9 80 schedule"(in 573 reviews)

Pros

"Work life balance"(in 83 reviews)

"Great benefits"(in 58 reviews)

Cons

"Large company"(in 163 reviews)

"Upper management"(in 162 reviews)

Cons

"Red tape"(in 14 reviews)

"Baltimore"(in 12 reviews)