Compare Procter & Gamble vs Unilever

See how working at Procter & Gamble vs. Unilever compares on a variety of workplace factors. By comparing employers on employee ratings, salaries, reviews, pros/cons, job openings and more, you'll feel one step ahead of the rest. All salaries and reviews are posted by employees working at Procter & Gamble vs. Unilever. Learn more about each company and apply to jobs near you.

Procter & Gamble

Consumer Product Manufacturing

Procter & Gamble

Consumer Product Manufacturing

Unilever

Consumer Product Manufacturing

Unilever

Consumer Product Manufacturing

Salaries

Plant Technician

189 Salaries

$23 / hr total

189 Salaries

Intern

136 Salaries

$5,340 / mo total

136 Salaries

Senior Financial Analyst

71 Salaries

$126,900 / yr total

71 Salaries

Machine Operator

35 Salaries

$22 / hr total

35 Salaries

Intern

49 Salaries

$24 / hr total

49 Salaries

Associate Finance Manager

71 Salaries

$109,605 / yr total

71 Salaries

Employee Ratings

Procter & Gamble scored higher in 6 areas: Overall Rating, Senior Management, Compensation & Benefits, Career Opportunities, CEO Approval and Positive Business Outlook.

Unilever scored higher in 2 areas: Work-life balance and Recommend to a friend.

Both tied in 2 areas: Culture & Values and Diversity & Inclusion.

Overall rating

4.2

★★★★★

Based on 12665 reviews

4.2

★★★★★

Based on 12665 reviews

4.2★

Culture & Values

4.2★

Culture & Values

4.3★

Diversity & Inclusion

4.3★

Diversity & Inclusion

3.4★

Work-life balance

3.4★

Work-life balance

3.8★

Senior Management

Higher rating

3.8★

Higher

Senior Management

4.1★

Compensation & Benefits

Higher rating

4.1★

Higher

Compensation & Benefits

4.0★

Career Opportunities

Higher rating

4.0★

Higher

Career Opportunities

Employee sentiment

90%CEO Approval

Jon R. Moeller

90%CEO Approval

Jon R. Moeller

83%

83%Recommend to a friend

83%

83%Recommend to a friend

77%

77%Positive Business Outlook

Procter & Gamble employees rated their Positive Business Outlook 5% higher than Unilever employees rated theirs.

77%

77%Positive Business Outlook

Overall rating

4.1

★★★★★

Based on 11282 reviews

4.1

★★★★★

Based on 11282 reviews

4.2★

Culture & Values

4.2★

Culture & Values

4.3★

Diversity & Inclusion

4.3★

Diversity & Inclusion

3.7★

Work-life balance

Higher rating

3.7★

Higher

Work-life balance

3.7★

Senior Management

3.7★

Senior Management

3.8★

Compensation & Benefits

3.8★

Compensation & Benefits

3.7★

Career Opportunities

3.7★

Career Opportunities

Employee sentiment

88%CEO Approval

Alan Jope

88%CEO Approval

Alan Jope

86%

86%Recommend to a friend

Unilever employees rated their Recommend to a friend 3% higher than Procter & Gamble employees rated theirs.

86%

86%Recommend to a friend

72%

72%Positive Business Outlook

72%

72%Positive Business Outlook

What Employees Say

"Promote from within" was the most mentioned Pro at Procter & Gamble. "Flexible working hours" was the most mentioned Pro at Unilever. "Slow decision making" was the most mentioned Con at Procter & Gamble. "Long working hours" was the most mentioned Con at Unilever.

Trending keywords

Pros

"Promote from within"in 153 reviews

"Work environment"in 423 reviews

Cons

"Slow decision making"in 428 reviews

"P amp g"in 406 reviews

Trending keywords

Pros

"Flexible working hours"in 299 reviews

"Place to learn"in 98 reviews

Cons

"Long working hours"in 228 reviews

"No work life"in 86 reviews

Featured Review

5.0

★★★★★

Mar 30, 2023

"Supply chain manager"

Current Employee - Supply Chain Manager

Pros

Good company with solid people development program

Cons

Too challenge to be promoted to next level

Featured Review

5.0

★★★★★

Mar 28, 2023

"Great company, brands & Great People"

Current Employee - Sr Brand Manager

Pros

The people you work with are superb - it's the perfect combination of good people & great talent. Brands are also great with a strong purpose.

Cons

Career growth is rare and pay, comparatively to the rest of the market, is sub par. I've also felt at times there are double standard on how people get promoted.