Bloomberg L.P. Interview Question: An array of 99 elements conta... | Glassdoor

Interview Question

Financial Software Developer Interview(Student Candidate) New York, NY

An array of 99 elements contains integers from 1 to

  100 with one missing element. Find the missing element.
Tags:
brain teaser, puzzle
Answer

Interview Answer

22 Answers

2

100

r on Oct 1, 2010
64

1. calculate the sum of elements in array say SUM
2. sum of numbers 1 to 100 is(n* (n+1))/2 = 5050 when n==100
3. missing element is (5050-SUM)

Sun on Oct 2, 2010
1

100

Ron on Oct 4, 2010
1

The parameters of the question do not allow you to determine what element is missing. Either more information should be supplied, or all answers are equally correct.

Steve on Oct 4, 2010
2

How could an array size of 99 elements contain 1 - 100? Should either be integers 1-99 or 2-100 , in either case there is no missing element. All indices are accounted for.

cody on Oct 5, 2010
14

Sum them and then subtract them from 5050.

In general, if an array of size n - 1 elements has unique elements from 1 to n, then the missing element can be found by subtracting the sum of the elements in the array from sum(1 ... n) = n * (n + 1) / 2.

Alternately, one could use a boolean array of length n with all values set to false and then for each value, set array[val - 1] to true. To find the missing value, scan through the array and find the index which is set to false. Return index + 1. This requires O(n) memory and two passes over an O(n) array (instead of constant memory and one pass), but has the advantage of actually allowing you to verify whether or not the input was well formed.

Erika on Oct 7, 2010
0

Admittedly, this question is poorly posed; however, the answer they are looking for refers to the syntax/nomenclature of some (not all) programming languages to index arrays starting at “0.” As such the 1-100 stored values would be in entries 0-99 of the array.

Lance on Oct 12, 2010
11

Read the question. Here are the steps to solve it:
1) find the sum of integers 1 to 100
2) subtract the sum of the 99 members of your set
3) the result is your missing element!
Very satisfying!

digin on Oct 12, 2010
2

Sort array.

While loop with an index variable with condition of next element being 1 greater than previous element.

When loop breaks, return the value of the index.

JW on Oct 13, 2010
1

Doing the expected sum and subtracting the actual gives the run time of O(2n), however a bucket sort will almost always do it in less time (somewhere between O(n) and O(2n)):

1. create a 101-int (or boolean) array (to have a 100-index)
2. traverse original and for each int, assign value in bucket array to 1 or true.
3.After first traversal, traverse created array starting at one, and when value is false, print it.

Bucket sort on Oct 14, 2010
0

100

Anonymous on Oct 18, 2010
0

100 coz in array it initial value starts frm 0 to 100. or else 4 further clarification u can study array chapter in c or c++

sandeep rai on Oct 19, 2010
0

100

anonymous on Oct 20, 2010
1

The question:
"An array of 99 elements contains integers from 1 to 100 with one missing element. Find the missing element."
The information states that the integer count is 1 to 100. I take this to be inclusive of all elements in the array so that the missing inters would be subjective to their arrangement or random. In other words, I do not have enough information to say which one.

DM on Oct 20, 2010
0

1

Anthony Craft on Oct 20, 2010
0

I need more information.
1. Are the integers unique in this array?
2. Do I have enough information to find the sum of the integers in the array (or some aggregation)?
If sum is available, then, the answer is 5050-sum{integers}.

a on Oct 20, 2010
1

Bucket Sort works and summation works. I think both are good, practical and clever solutions. I think sorting the array then searching may be unnecessary computation.

Another interesting method which may be faster. SIMD computers may do this particularly quickly:

Do a bitwise operation on all the elements:

Result = Array[0] xor Array[1] xor ... Array[98] xor 1 xor 2 xor ... xor 100

Result = Missing number.

Explanation:

When you xor 2 identical numbers your result = 0. For example, 5 xor 5 -> 101 xor 101 = 000. (5 in decimal is 101 in binary). Knowing that "xoring" 2 identical numbers results in zero is useful.

Now we apply this useful info to the problem. Array is Identical to a list of 1,2,3,...,100 except for one number. In other words 1,2,3,...,100 duplicates all of array's elements and adds one extra element that is missing in Array. Therefore, we now have 2 instances of each element in the Array in addition to one extra element in 1,2,3,...,100. We can see when you xor two duplicate numbers you get zero. Because we have pairs for all numbers in Array and one extra number we are essentially "xoring" the missing number with zero. When we xor the missing number with zero we get the missing number. (For example, 6 xor 0 -> 110 xor 000 = 110)

Steven on Oct 20, 2010
0

The question states that one (not two or three or n) element ("value") from 1 to 100 is missing.

There are 99 elements ("values") in the array.

The question implies that the data is well-formed because it states that only element is missing. It doesn't ask you to find the missing value(s), but the one (singular) missing element.

With the problem constrained, the solution falls out. Subtracting from 5050 is an elegant solution, but not obvious as to why it works. The array of booleans is more obvious, but doesn't scale well.

Julie on Oct 22, 2010
1

I agree with one of the answers in this thread...5050-sum(elements) = missing item.
Other approach that crossed my mind is something similar to binary search.
Check the index of 50th element: if A(50) == 50, the missing element > 50, else if A(50) > 50, missing element <50. Do this iteratively. The number of comparisons would be log 100 = 7.

Akshay Kumar on Feb 23, 2013
1

0

Anonymous on Apr 3, 2015
0

100

Anonymous on Jan 9, 2016
0

Add 1-100 to a hash of 100 elements. Then compare each element with the hash.. Answer in o(n)

Anonymous on Feb 13, 2017

Add Answers or Comments

To comment on this, Sign In or Sign Up.