WW / WeightWatchers Interview Questions

Good Interview, went through specifics of role, not too difficult. Interviewer was very detailed about role and allowed me time to ask questions. Do not believe role was a fit for me but at least interview went well.

Great questions were asked about my experience and the conversation came organically. I didn’t even have to remember what I memorized, the conversation just made it so easy for me to share my experience

Its fast and it could be better. Maybe one time they should stop and just hire ppl. Honestly its a real pain i have to enter all this info to see some reviews

Initial screening over the phone followed up by in person group interview where we demonstrated our speaking and presentation skills. We did some role playing and were asked comprehensive questions

Had 4 rounds. 1 with HR and then 3 separate with people from the team. Everyone was super kind and helpful through the process. Entire Process took about a month.

Lengthy. Interviewer appeared to intentionally drag things along. Apparently this is not just my experience with same interviewer. I believe I read similar from others. At first interviewer sounded knowledgeable but now not so sure n

Recruiter was super nice and the whole process was smooth. First was HR round and then there was a technical assessment. Finally, there was a two-round back-to-back technical interview. Questions were of average difficulty.

I was referred by a colleague. I had one call with and internal recruiter and then had No follow up after. Disappointing processes but not surprised based on massive exec turnover.

The interview process entailed meeting with the recruiter, hiring manager and then 2-3 additional 30 minute interviews with other team members. It was about a 3-4 week process from start to finish. The recruiter was very vocal during the entire process about next steps.

Started with a standard recruiter screen. My resume matched word-for-word with the description posted so both recruiter and I felt it would be a great fit. Then had an initial take-home coding assignment on CodeSignal, one of the many code test platforms. Pretty standard stuff, implementing a basic algorithm. Scored 100% and passed. I was then told I'd be speaking to the hiring manager and doing some live coding, also standard stuff. However, the live coding turned out to be a toy problem on balancing brackets in a string - nothing relevant to the job, no signal capturing of my experience at all. And the interview was staged such that the hiring manager and another engineer just sat there, pasted a problem into an editor and didn't say a word as I tried to dust off cobwebs on college sophomore level data structures. Gigantic waste of time for everyone, absolutely no reason to do this live. I learned from the recruiter that they were "having trouble hiring for this position" and had rejected 3 similarly well-qualified candidates. No surprise, if this is the silly kind of thing they are making or breaking candidates on at the STAFF level. In the feedback the recruiter sent me, the hiring manager tediously nitpicked every little keystroke of my process (for example, "didn't close the parentheses on function first time, got eventually"), things that any working professional might go through in the course of writing production grade code. Clearly overly pedantic and unfocused minds on this team, stay away.