Employers are looking for security officers who are dedicated to protecting people through their attentiveness to detail and ability to detect danger. Expect interviewers to inquire about your physical fitness and ability to handle a tense or potentially harmful situation. Security officers may work closely with customers, so be sure to emphasize that you possess great interpersonal skills.
Here are three top security officer interview questions and how to answer them:
How to answer: When asked this question, interviewers want to make sure you have the mental and physical strength to deal with a dangerous patron. Use this opportunity to explain your experience in the field.
How to answer: A guest that is posing a threat to others isn't always obvious, so interviewers want to know how you identify these guests before a situation gets serious. Sometimes these situations involve multiple members of security staff working together to prevent a potentially dangerous altercation. Consider talking about a time where you were a team player on the job.
How to answer: While a security officer position is a physical job, some technology may be involved. If you're applying for a position that requires you to work with security cameras and software, you can either explain your experience with these technologies or you can express your ability to become more computer literate if hired for the position.
↳
I used a whiteboard to draw out a basic network architecture including security technologies like IPS/IDS, Firewalls, AV, etc, and described the type of traffic and logs I could use to identify a compromised system. Less
↳
Upper management needs to be involved and on board, you must be able to accept that no system is completely secure so you must have a great defense in depth strategy, and users need to be trained and kept involved. Users are your biggest threat and your greatest assets as well. If your users are in the know, your system is much more secure than if users are not trained to constantly think secure. Less
↳
I answered that I want everyone to feel safe and at ease while in public places etc. Less
↳
I love to protect people and have them feel safe
↳
I want to work Armed security
↳
I will extinguish the fire if am comfortable enough to handle it if not I will call to civil defence and also call to my supervisor or site manager and I will try to all the people go to a safe palace frome fired area Less
↳
My capa bule iam off the fire not capable on the fire allaram and calining security oficer. Next capable. Iam. All materialsremoved the fire side Less
↳
Fast cleaning the all gas line. Removed the all material fair side. Capable iam youse the fire extinguisher not capable pus the allaram buten. Call the securite oficer Less
↳
It's unfortunate that the way you were dismissed was a little bit unprofessional and seemingly misinformed. Also, in fairness, it's probably never a good idea to tell a candidate that they're "just average", even in cases where they really are. For what it's worth, I'd like to apologize on behalf of DD (as much as I'm technically allowed to do so) for the way it was handled. However, regarding the original point, the interview itself is specifically designed to fluster you. We actually expect most people to get this particular question wrong. The idea is not for us to see if you know it all but more specifically how you deal with questions you don't know the answer to. (Bonus points if you DO know, obviously.) We certainly don't expect candidates to know everything offhand, we just like to see whether or not you're going to try to BS your way through an answer. Since I wasn't on this particular call, I have no idea how it went for you but I can guarantee that the decision wasn't based on this question alone but was more likely an overall view of your skills based on all of your answers. I do realize that it's no picnic when you're on the phone but for the most part, they do try to take that into consideration. (I was hired over the phone as well, all the way from South Africa.) Less
↳
I do understand what you have said, and I greatly appreciate the apology. I was very excited about this opportunity. I believe based off my experience and my knowledge of the position that I would have been a great asset to the team. I honestly do not know why the engineers I interviewed with or the recruiter would have felt the way the recruiter did. I know that the engineers I spoke with told me that the recruiter would call me with the next steps and I answered every question that they asked, except the afore mentioned question. The following link is my linkedin profile (http://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=10589063&trk=tab_pro). This is about all I can say. I was excited and looking forward to the opportunity, but obviously I was not considered. Thank you for your time, response, and consideration. I wish you the best. Less
↳
In window you use tracert which works with icmp echo and reply message and in cisco environment you use traceroute command undp as well as icmp. But you have to configure for firewall to allow icmp replies Less
↳
Did you go for orientation yet?
↳
Orientation takes about 4 hours. You are fingerprinted and briefed on company policies, sexual harassment, how you will get payed, signing in, writing reports, ect . Less
↳
That's not bad, do you get drug tested again?
↳
how open is your schedule
↳
Have worked with Mr.Lipman of Guardsmark Personally, willing to work hard.
↳
Ready to at anytime soon.
↳
It's a good company
↳
Good company to work for
↳
Like to be part of this environment