Yandex.Praktikum

Yandex.Praktikum Interviews

1. Apr 13, 2023

   Reviewer Interview

   Anonymous Employee in Moscow, Moskva

   No Offer

   Negative Experience

   Easy Interview

   Application

   I applied online. I interviewed at Yandex.Praktikum (Moscow, Moskva) in Mar 2023

   Interview

   This position involves 2 stages of selection: -Test assignment; -Onboarding (takes place in webinars at zoom and lasts a week). Then we do a test assignment, the completed task will be checked within 14 days.
   

   Interview

   ### ** Assignment 1.1. Make a use case description for one of the following use cases:** - A reviewer checking the student's homework and entering the results of the review. - The student's appeal of the reviewer's grade. The description should include basic and alternative scenarios. Make your own assumptions about how the user and system interact. ### ** Assignment 1.2. Make an ER diagram in any notation you choose. The ER diagram must contain at least the following entities: student, study group, course, homework, reviewer, homework review result. The diagram should show the main attributes of the entity and the relationships between them. ### ** Assignment 1.3. Construct a description of a minimal REST API that allows a reviewer to receive homework for review and send the results of the review.** The description should contain at least a list of methods (name, verb, url), description of input and output data. ### ** Assignment 1.4. Compose a prototype of a screen form on which a reviewer enters feedback (the result of the check) on a student's homework assignment.** Make an assumption about the composition of the information the reviewer enters by yourself. ## Assignment 2. Weekdays at Work Approximate Running Time ≈ 1.5 hours The reviewer has a lot of interaction with students, checking their homework and projects and answering questions. In order to effectively help with student backlogs, you must not only be open(ed) to help and patient, but also have an erudition of the broad stack of technology and theory behind it. The role of the reviewer in the educational process is very important: he or she reviews the project written by the student and gives developmental feedback. It is the reviewer who decides whether or not to credit the assignment. The reviewer only communicates with the student as part of the project; there is no communication in Slack. Therefore, students write their questions directly into the project. Often the reviewer's "work shift" will contain a breakdown of the questions. So we suggest that you feel like a reviewer right now, and answer a few possible questions from students. It will help us and you test your erudition and your interest in doing this kind of work. ### **Case 2.1** Context: Requirements gathering and analysis sprint, student makes a description of the use cases (by Coburn) Student Question: Hi! I'm writing use case descriptions (DU), and it turns out that I have the same two alternative scenarios in all DU - a system error (something broke on the server) and a user cancellation. Should I copy them to each VI or can I somehow write them once?

   Answer Question