employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

West Point Optical Group

Is this your company?

Awful. Absolutely awful. Do what you can to avoid this company at all costs. - Anonymous employee West Point Optical Group Employee Review

1.0
Apr 4, 2022
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Pay is good. Opportunity to advance within the company is good because everyone higher up is quitting.

Cons

Extreme "lean labor model" means working alone or with one other person. Locations are busy, patients jobs get lost because you have no time to train staff, upper management yells to increase sales on various items, you're made to feel insignificant and you receive absolutely no positive feedback whatsoever, group chats are just bragging contests, expected to work nonstop and make your life revolve around your job, multiple location travel with no compensation regardless of how far you're traveling, disgusting contests that belittle employees, infighting because of said contests, overbooking and overscheduling appointments, forced to go pester businesses near by with marketing material, extremely shady corporate decisions, heavily encouraged to do work at home and on your days off, coworkers and upper management stepping on each other's toes to advance, etc. Lost goes on.

Explore other reviews about West Point Optical Group

5.0
Jun 2, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great Manager for the stores, above is not so great

Cons

Hours fluctuate repetitive reports that are online for upper managment to access

2.0
Mar 15, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Competitive compensation and several capable leaders within upper management who genuinely want the organization to succeed. The company has the potential to be a very strong workplace and could retain many talented employees if accountability and professional standards were applied consistently across all leadership levels.

Cons

Lack of accountability for certain individuals in leadership roles has created significant cultural challenges. Concerns regarding retaliation, misuse of authority, and inappropriate workplace conduct were raised internally multiple times through appropriate channels, including HR and ownership. These concerns were not isolated incidents but issues that were known internally and raised by multiple employees over time. In several cases internal investigations were conducted, yet from an employee perspective the circumstances did not appear to result in meaningful corrective action. Individuals involved continued in the same roles and capacities, which significantly eroded trust in the reporting process. In addition to these concerns, employees experienced patterns of verbal and psychological mistreatment by certain leadership members, contributing to a difficult and stressful work environment. Over time this culture resulted in significant turnover. More than fifteen employees ultimately chose to leave rather than remain in an environment where serious concerns had been raised repeatedly but did not appear to result in substantive organizational change. The decision to leave was not based on a single incident, but on the repeated experience of seeing serious concerns raised without meaningful resolution.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All