★
FHI 360 Employee Reviews about "upper management"
Updated Sep 24, 2023
Clear All
Full-time, Part-time
English
Verify your email to use filters. Having problems? Resend email
Found 614 of over 745 reviews
86% Recommend to a Friend
96% Approve of CEO
Found 17 of over 745 reviews
Popular
- Popular
- Most Recent
- Highest Rating
- Lowest Rating
Recommend to a Friend
Approve of CEO
Tessie San Martin, PhD, MS
70 Ratings
What are your colleagues talking about?
Find your exclusive Company Bowl on Community. Join the hottest conversation with your colleagues anonymously.
Top Review Highlights by Sentiment
Excerpts from user reviews, not authored by Glassdoor
Pros
Cons
- "Pay is low for the requirements to get a technical job (some of our interns have masters degrees)." (in 21 reviews)
- "Bloated at the top with many senior staff receiving high salaries without contributing to projects or bringing in new funding" (in 13 reviews)
- "Upper management seems completely cut off and detached from the real world and their employees." (in 12 reviews)
Ratings by Demographics
This rating reflects the overall rating of FHI 360 and is not affected by filters.
Reviews about "upper management"
Return to all Reviews- 3.0May 16, 2019Applications AnalystCurrent Employee, less than 1 year
Pros
Company has good benefits for a non profit organisation. Very well diverse. Good 401(k)
Cons
Some upper management does lots of micromanagement. They want to see you on your desk from 9 to 5.Irrespective of the productivity. Do not give you work from home etc, But it varies project to project.
3 - 3.0Feb 3, 2016Project ManagerCurrent EmployeeWashington, DC
Pros
Great colleagues, great projects, people work hard and are dedicated. There is a lot of interesting and important work going on at FHI 360. Benefits are great and salary is generous. Great for technically-oriented job seekers.
Cons
As mentioned in so many other reviews, upper management is seriously out of touch with the zeitgeist of the organization and their employees. Internal systems are inefficient, the quality of support services is often abysmal. The operational aspects of running projects are more DIY, without any cross-project learning or support systems. Not sure there is a viable, long-term strategic plan in place. Upper management only seems to listen to those in their immediate circle, which leads to strategic decisions that benefit those individuals and their careers more than the organization as a whole. For more support services-oriented job seekers - do your homework and talk to people in the organization before considering a position with the org.
12
Join the FHI 360 team
