Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory Reviews | Glassdoor

Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory Reviews

Updated March 20, 2017
9 reviews

Filter

Filter


3.8
Star Star Star Star Star
Rating Trends Rating Trends
Recommend to a friend
Approve of CEO
Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory Director Charles Alcock
Charles Alcock
1 Rating

Employee Reviews

Sort: Popular Rating Date

  1. "Fantastic, provided you are "in the club""

    Star Star Star Star Star
    • Work/Life Balance
    • Culture & Values
    • Career Opportunities
    • Comp & Benefits
    • Senior Management
    Current Employee - Astrophysicist in Cambridge, MA
    Current Employee - Astrophysicist in Cambridge, MA
    Recommends
    Positive Outlook
    No opinion of CEO

    I have been working at Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory full-time (More than a year)

    Pros

    Great benefits, such as retirement contributions
    Intellectually stimulating
    Flexible hours

    Cons

    Slow advancement unless you have unique skills, particularly in hardware development
    The place lives off of postdocs


  2. "Neat place to work, lots of projects to work on"

    Star Star Star Star Star
    • Work/Life Balance
    • Culture & Values
    • Career Opportunities
    • Comp & Benefits
    • Senior Management
    Current Employee - IT Specialist (Appsw) in Cambridge, MA
    Current Employee - IT Specialist (Appsw) in Cambridge, MA
    Recommends
    Neutral Outlook

    Pros

    - friendly and knowledgeable work environment
    - 13+ days of PTO starting (19 days after 3 years; 26 days after 15 years), with up to 240 hours you can carry over to the next year
    - reimbursed academic classes
    - potential for travel to domestic/international astronomy conferences
    - get free entry (+1 guest) to museums and zoos in the greater Boston area
    - work with scientists on interesting astronomy projects

    Cons

    - SAO is divided into multiple buildings, some driving distance away from the others, making cross-office meetings and meeting other coworkers difficult for those without cars
    - salary may be on the low side for a trained software developer, depending on the pay grade you get


  3. "Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory"

    Star Star Star Star Star
    • Work/Life Balance
    • Culture & Values
    • Career Opportunities
    • Comp & Benefits
    • Senior Management
    Former Employee - Anonymous Employee in Cambridge, MA
    Former Employee - Anonymous Employee in Cambridge, MA
    Recommends
    Positive Outlook

    I worked at Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory full-time

    Pros

    World-class astrophysical research. The most challenging technical projects.

    Cons

    The usual soft money scientist positions.


  4. Is this helpful? The community relies on everyone sharing – Add Anonymous Review


  5. "Big name, small goals"

    Star Star Star Star Star
    • Work/Life Balance
    • Culture & Values
    • Career Opportunities
    • Comp & Benefits
    • Senior Management
    Current Employee - Staff Astronomer in Cambridge, MA
    Current Employee - Staff Astronomer in Cambridge, MA
    Doesn't Recommend
    Neutral Outlook

    I have been working at Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory full-time (More than 5 years)

    Pros

    Everyone recognises the Smithsonian brand. Decent vacation days once you've worked there for 3 years (13 days/year before that; 19 days/year after). Interesting colleagues working on diverse astronomical topics. Great for pre- and postdocs.

    Cons

    Salaries follow the Federal GS scale and it is difficult to get promoted above Grade 13 as a scientist, which means your salary will not be high given the cost of living in the Cambridge area. As a scientist you get no overtime pay; you're expected to work 50+ hours for the love of astronomy and because "it's a privilege" to work there (these are actual words that were said to me by an associate director when I asked why they didn't do anything to compensate us better). It's hard for a junior scientist who has a management rather than a research position to move up, and there is little interest to innovate or change how things are done (which is how they've been done for the past few decades).

    Advice to Management

    You need to listen to the complaints of your stuff and not belittle them. There's a reason junior staff are leaving for industry positions.


  6. Helpful (3)

    "Awful"

    Star Star Star Star Star
    • Work/Life Balance
    • Culture & Values
    • Career Opportunities
    • Comp & Benefits
    • Senior Management
    Former Employee - Scientist in Cambridge, MA
    Former Employee - Scientist in Cambridge, MA
    Doesn't Recommend
    Neutral Outlook
    No opinion of CEO

    Pros

    TIAA-CREF, I guess. Nothing exceptional.

    Cons

    This place is... horrible. Bigotry, inappropriate language, and favoritism are rampant. Complaints are treated with reprisals. Management has a hierarchy that prevents openness and cooperation. Yearly reviews are biased and capable people who are not part of the special cliques are disregarded.

    Awful educational benefits for an institution connected to Harvard.

    The yearly surveys are ignored.

    Boston is an expensive place to live. SAO salaries are well-below averages.

    This place is in desperate need of new management.

    Advice to Management

    Respect your people.


  7. "SAO is full of dedicated smart people"

    Star Star Star Star Star
    • Work/Life Balance
    • Culture & Values
    • Career Opportunities
    • Comp & Benefits
    • Senior Management
    Current Employee - Physic Ist in Cambridge, MA
    Current Employee - Physic Ist in Cambridge, MA
    Recommends
    Neutral Outlook
    Disapproves of CEO

    I have been working at Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory full-time (More than 10 years)

    Pros

    World-class colleagues. Access to good facilities.

    Cons

    Increasingly bureaucratic with administrative considerations given more weight than the needs of scientists.

    Advice to Management

    Provide company credit cards (not P-cards) for those needing to make lots of small (under $1000) purchases.


  8. Helpful (2)

    "Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics"

    Star Star Star Star Star
    • Work/Life Balance
    • Career Opportunities
    • Comp & Benefits
    • Senior Management
    Current Employee - Astronomer in Cambridge, MA
    Current Employee - Astronomer in Cambridge, MA
    Recommends

    Pros

    - great place for research
    - great team working opportunities
    - relaxed and professional work atmosphere
    - excellent community environment (Harvard & MIT nearby)

    Cons

    - off-site from main Smithsonian location in Washington
    - limited access to Smithsonian resources
    - limited access to Harvard resources
    - limited funding/professional development opportunities

    Advice to Management

    - better collaboration between Smithsonian in Washington and the Harvard SMithsonian Center for Astrophysics, e.g. a bi-annual Smithsonian conference
    - improved options for professional development within the Harvard community


  9. "great place to work"

    Star Star Star Star Star
    • Work/Life Balance
    • Culture & Values
    • Career Opportunities
    • Comp & Benefits
    • Senior Management
    Current Employee - Anonymous Employee
    Current Employee - Anonymous Employee
    Recommends
    Neutral Outlook

    I have been working at Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory full-time

    Pros

    One of the largest astronomical centers in the world. Close collaboration with Harvard astronomy department. Top-notch research and access to facilities.

    Cons

    Older, crowded building. Difficult commute. Not fully competitive salaries. Limited lunch options in the building. No other cons come to mind.

    Advice to Management

    No advice.


  10. "Good place to do astrophysics."

    Star Star Star Star Star
    Former Employee - Anonymous Employee
    Former Employee - Anonymous Employee

    Pros

    One of the largest concentrations of astrophysicists in the world.

    Cons

    No new large projects; money is tight.