Twitter Reviews

Cons

Not growing very quickly but pace is OK

Cons

Not productive overall
Conservative strategy and product improvement
More and more engineers are getting laid back or lazy
Not enough workforce that results in chaotic collaboration
Product planning and sync are sometimes unclear that responsibilities get shifted

Cons

- Do not respect deadline enough
- Hard to get things done because of the complicated processes.

Cons

Lack of transparency through the company and your boss.

Cons

Leadership was questionable and revolving door
Company solved for rev growth at the sacrifice of product innovation which hurt user count
No clarity into career growth beyond surface-level support

Cons

Lots of leadership changes meant the company would change direction often, and it was hard to work on a great product but disagree with a lot of the decisions coming down from the top.

Cons

Privacy concerns in the world

Cons

* It is harder to have an impact from a distributed office than from the SF HQ
* High turnover in senior management making it hard to rally behind them

Cons

No clear product strategy. Pay may be below other tech companies depending on the role.

Cons

Twitter is the most badly managed company I've worked at with the most incompetent managers on the planet. At Twitter you get rewarded for being nice and putting in face time, no matter how you managed to hit your goals. Managers put very little thought into giving you challenging goals or holding the team accountable. Managers (in cahoots with HR) make your life a living hell. You should only stay at Twitter if you cannot get a job elsewhere. If you do decide to stay, after 2 years the most likely outcome is that you will become a manager or if you are especially incompetent you will become a Director or VP. If you want to make a difference, find some other place.