Verisk Analytics Reviews

Cons

The firm is in the midst of an incredibly rapid shift. Though the long term is bright, there are certainly some growing pains. That said, with pain comes growth and with growth comes opportunity.

Cons

Management favoritism started affecting work environment!

Cons

they are not very active to answer your questions

Cons

- Not very social
- Bad Management
- Not great training

Cons

I haven't seen any cons or heard much of any complaints. Most people that work here do not quit, they actually retire or are promoted.

Cons

Sometimes had no tasks to do for the day which was quite boring. You may have to put in the effort to get involved as some managers give less work than others.

Cons

Too much office politics within management.

Cons

The upper management are nice and humble people but somewhat out of date in terms of core competencies than what you would find in other companies. Most people have worked at the company for 10-25 years which makes it for a stale environment.
ISO is the data arm of the insurance industry that has a near monopoly which is what has kept Verisk in a position with little in the way of competitors. Because of this it acts more like the post office, which is a big part of the problem in working there. Since they do not need to compete - the culture is stagnant.
The company has lost touch with their customers and in fact is the least customer concentric company ever that exists. As a result, the data and technology and people are outdated and very legacy.
While management cares , they don't have the best talent in non-actuarial roles. The company was built by actuarial, so it is not dynamic -actually a bit dull, siloed and insular environment. It is the antithesis of the” one of the most innovative company” it's just to opposite. Its innovative because of the growth rate through acquisition and nothing more. But the people are nice.
There is an unwillingness for some long time employees to embrace the culture of change but they are trying to change that.

Cons

little room to advance, management focus on the wrong aspect

Cons

I feel like I'm in an environment that does not encourage learning. We are not encouraged to find technical ways of testing, like automation, SQL, performance testing, or security testing. It seems like we're discouraged from becoming more valuable by learning these things, but then we're not valued because we don't have those skills.