In this blog, I’ll examine why employer branding is something not always in the control of the employer, but is nonetheless something that employers need to be wary of.
Specifically, I’m going to be talking about Glassdoor and how it ought to be an active part of every person who has anything to do with recruitment’s strategy.
I like social media. I like the transparency it brings to organizations, and the voice it gives to anyone who uses it.
I also thus like Glassdoor for the same reasons.
It’s been said that Glassdoor is one of the fastest-growing jobs and recruitment sites in the world today, and that’s because it started with a goal of creating greater transparency between job seeker and employer. I’ve used it as a job seeker. I’ve used it as a recruiter. I’ve used it as an HR Director. And I’ve used it as a consultant when advising organizations. What I hadn’t realized until fairly recently, though, was that organizations can advertise jobs on the site, and therefore it ought to become a much more visible and integrated part of organizational recruitment strategy.
[Related: Post a Job on Glassdoor for Free]
I said before that Glassdoor (and other sites like it that capture public views of an organization) should be part of any recruiters’ talent strategy. And I mean recruiters in the widest sense, from the hiring manager who recruits now and again, to the HR professional who does frequent recruitment around their other responsibilities, to the in-house recruiter who does recruitment all the time, to the external recruiter who works with a range of candidates AND organizations.
And it should be part of their strategy because of the developing concept of the informed candidate.
Why Glassdoor specifically? Glassdoor provides candidates with access to information that the organization hasn’t necessarily chosen to give them. It might resemble some of the information on the corporate website, and it might bear even less resemblance to the glossy candidate brochure the applicant can access. It might, if the organization is lucky, have some of the same words in use that the recruiters use to describe the organization to candidates when they brief them about the vacancy.
But not necessarily.
Like consumers do with TripAdvisor, candidates will go to Glassdoor to find out what people LIKE THEM feel about a company. Not what the organization wishes to share with them. I suppose that with Glassdoor also hosting job advertisements, the candidate might be going there specifically to look for jobs too, so it makes sense to have good content up there in case someone stumbles across your page.
The candidate is conducting due diligence, and for all the best reasons — deciding whether to apply for a job with that organization, and if they have applied, doing their research pre-interview and figuring out if they’ve made the right decision to apply!
[Related: How to Recruit Informed Candidates at Scale]
So the informed candidate is out there, looking at information OTHER people have given about your organization, and potentially reading all sorts of stuff you as a recruiter don’t want them to read.
So of course you should have Glassdoor as part of your talent strategy. Why wouldn’t you?
It’s been reported that candidates are using information they find on Glassdoor to research questions they may want to ask at an interview. So do your hiring managers, front and center in the interview itself, need to see what’s there so they can prepare? I’d say yes. I know if I were interviewing, I’d want to be able to plan for questions a candidate might ask about my organization and might want some foreknowledge of that too.
With those things in mind, it becomes important for organizations to seek to manage some of the content that’s out there. Your employer brand exists online, whether you like it or not. There’s formal pages like on Glassdoor, but there’s also the chatter that goes on on Twitter and other social channels. It strikes me as odd if you don’t want or have some influence over that.
Organizations can’t control it, but they can put their own content out there to try to make their recruitment more effective and efficient and to make selection easier. This is about companies managing their own Glassdoor pages and creating content to go alongside the content created by other people that might help to create a sense that the company invests time in employee engagement and cares about its employee value proposition.
In this sense, a company might choose to respond to reviews it receives. One of the arguments I’ve heard against organizational use of social media sites is the fear of negative publicity or bad comments. Bad comments and reviews aren’t necessarily a blow to the employer brand or to business, but an opportunity to manage things for a better outcome and show interest in the candidate experience and the wider employee experience.
It might also help candidates to self-select. After all, the more transparent an organization is, the more content it puts out there, the more unsuitable candidates will be able to use it to choose NOT to apply, and the more the suitable candidates will choose to apply. So as an organization, you’d want to ensure candidates have access to the right information, from both the company and the wider public, to help them do that — after all, the wrong candidate might sneak through. Also, if you know that your page will help candidates to self-select whether to apply for a position in your company, it would be logical to use the site to advertise any vacancies you might have to save people from having to find the links elsewhere.
And this makes me wonder why there are still organizations who don’t have a presence at all. Where there’s little or even nothing there managed by the company, and nothing to be seen from candidates or employees either, I wonder what the organization is thinking in allowing this situation to develop, and whether there’s something about employee engagement that the company needs to address.
And that’s something I’ll address in a follow up to this blog in a couple of weeks time, on how HR professionals can find a wider use and relevance for Glassdoor.
But for now, I strongly suggest that you check out Glassdoor to see what opportunities it offers you as a recruiter, because your candidates already are.
This article was originally published on EPIC HR.