Challenging - Product Owner (PO) Thredd Employee Review

2.0
Jan 11, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Some great people and a decent salary

Cons

Senior management cannot work together so there’s constant conflict between departments. Changing priorities means that you will never get one thing done. US based leaders so expect late night calls.

avatar
Thredd Response
4mo
Hi, thank you for sharing your thoughts about your time at Thredd. We're sorry you didn't have a great experience during your time here, We are always open to change and making improvements to try make Thredd the best place to work. Related to your comments on cross-functional team collaboration, we are working hard in this area and are gathering more feedback on how teams work cross-functionally in focus groups to improve this which also includes senior management. We are also sorry to hear about your thoughts on changing priorities. As we grow there has been factors that have caused a change in priority as we are also trying to maintain our first class service we provide to our clients. Thanks again for taking the time to leave this review and we wish you the best in your career.

Explore other reviews about Thredd

3.0
Jun 14, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great place to work, stressful sometimes.

Cons

Future is unpredictable, KPIs are not hit

1.0
Jun 1, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

There are a few good people trying to make a difference. Pros: * Talented and hardworking colleagues. * Some interesting technical challenges.

Cons

I waited a while before writing this review because I wanted enough distance from the experience to reflect on it properly. Having worked at a number of companies throughout my career, I can honestly say this was one of the most difficult and disappointing working environments I have encountered. The culture was characterised by high stress, uncertainty and a lack of trust between teams. Long hours were common, priorities shifted constantly, and there was rarely a clear or stable roadmap. Collaboration between departments often felt adversarial rather than constructive, creating unnecessary friction and making it harder to deliver meaningful outcomes. I found support from leadership to be inconsistent, particularly when concerns were raised around workload, team dynamics or employee wellbeing. Employees were frequently left feeling that they had to protect themselves rather than rely on management for guidance or support. HR, like many HR departments, appeared focused on protecting the interests of the business, leaving employees with little confidence that concerns would be addressed impartially. The recent decision to make a significant proportion of the engineering organisation redundant only reinforced my view that employees are viewed as a cost to be managed rather than people to be valued. The lack of transparency, poor planning and constant uncertainty contributed to an environment where morale was consistently low and stress levels were unnecessarily high. What disappointed me most was the apparent lack of accountability from senior leadership. Rather than addressing the underlying organisational issues, there seemed to be a culture of blame, politics and self-preservation. Teams often worked against one another instead of together, and bullying behaviours were too often tolerated or ignored. Cons: * Poor communication from leadership. * Constant organisational instability. * Long hours and unrealistic expectations. * Weak collaboration between teams. * Limited support for employee wellbeing. * A culture driven by politics rather than outcomes. * Lack of trust in senior management. I have worked in demanding environments before, but this was the first company where I genuinely felt that the culture had a negative impact on my mental wellbeing. I would strongly encourage anyone considering joining to speak with current and former employees before making a decision.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All