employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Accreditation Council For Graduate Medical Education

Engaged Employer

Meaningful work and collegiality, but culture declining - Director Accreditation Council For Graduate Medical Education Employee Review

2.0
Apr 27, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The work is meaningful, and there's a lot of collegiality among employees (especially those that have been there for several years). Opportunities for lateral movement, and promotion from within for some departments. Pay and benefits are decent.

Cons

The culture is deteriorating quickly and work-life balance is not good. The new CEO cannot articulate her vision for the employee body but makes decisions that have a huge impact on their lives. HR is incompetent and unfair and does not provide adequate support or training to middle managers. Return to office was implemented poorly, and the organization is consequently losing many talented employees. While compensation on paper looks good, HR won't take the time to pay people what they're worth/what their jobs are worth.

Explore other reviews about Accreditation Council For Graduate Medical Education

5.0
Oct 22, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Nice people who want to see you succeed. Courses for professional development and great office space

Cons

N/A great so far with this company

2.0
May 23, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The best part of this organization is the people: my colleagues were largely fantastic: smart, dedicated to the mission, funny, hard working. Some of them have been there for three-plus decades. Salary, benefits, and time off have been solid, but that’s been changing since the new CEO started Jan 2025. (The location of the organization and the CEO here on Glassdoor are both out of date, as of this writing.)

Cons

A culture shift happened early 2025 with the new CEO. She closed two departments, one at the behest of the Trump administration and removed any mention of DEI from the organization, including from stated values. During my time there, the CEO had yet to articulate her vision for this incarnation of the organization. The quality and quantity of communication from the top had diminished significantly. On top of that, she instituted an RTO policy, that seemed rather ruthless after six years of working remotely with no issues: she terminated those who were unable to be in the office two days a week. The culture is more divisive than ever with the clear sense that leadership feels the employees are “gaming the system” and employees are feeling like widgets that can be easily replaced, There’s a lack of confidence in the CEO’s knowledge of how the organization actually works and a lack of leadership ability. She’s a chaotic micromanager, adding uncertainty and instability to an already challenging time (change in leadership). Morale is at its lowest.

4
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All