Check out your Company Bowl for anonymous work chats.
Pros
- best team leads and department managers - supportive and understanding staff - a lot of opportunities to learn
Cons
- top management slow down important decisions at the unit level - some of the decisions are not taken impartially and objectively (which was connected only to one particular manager, hopefully current policy has changed)
Pros
Great team and collaborative environment
Cons
Salaries are lower than average Personal growth opportunities are limited There is no fully remote work option
Pros
first job, flexible hours, no requirements
Cons
low salary, no self development opportunities
Pros
Flexible working hours, open for students
Cons
Legacy projects, lack of opportunities to grow, low pay
Pros
Big company with stable work
Cons
Had good team and opportunities
Pros
- Experience with banking applications
Cons
- no appreciation of young employees, - no career growth - bad attitude on the part of your bosses: if you start fighting for a salary increase (their argument is that you become too intrusive and they don't want to work with people who only think about money).
Pros
Personal development, Friendly Atmosphere, Diverse tasks
Cons
Workload intensity, career Advancement Pace
Pros
Healthcare. Flexible hybrid schedule (flexibility is necessary when you’re expected to meet deadlines while working across time zones with teams entirely in Poland). You get a monthly health & wellness stipend (gym, etc.), which is nice — and may slightly offset the slow erosion of your sanity as you forget how a normal company operates efficiently and professionally.
Cons
They cut budgets, don’t provide basic tools required to do the job (unless we pay for them ourselves), and then roll out Google Workspace in a way that blocks every useful extension — so now we can’t even use apps to help move projects along or meet unrealistic deadlines and goals set by inexperienced, ego-driven leadership who are too afraid to listen to what people actually need to generate revenue. Oh, and that’s before they increase KPIs with zero justification. The company has been on a steep decline since layoffs, including people with actual experience and institutional knowledge who helped grow the US region. Now they’re trying to rehire people to replace them — because that’s obviously a smart and efficient strategy. Everything is in Poland. Everything. Tools, training, support, career growth — and half the meetings happen before the sun comes up. Even if you want to do the job you were hired to do, Poland requires you to outline every step and submit a request for them to create or execute it. If you try to just do the work yourself (basic work), you might get pushback for… doing your job. And don’t expect a meeting to communicate what you need — that won’t happen. Instead, it gets assigned elsewhere, creating “growth opportunities” for someone else. But hey, if you’re Polish and in Poland, at least you get development opportunities — so good for them, I guess. Leadership in Poland seems genuinely frustrated that U.S. teams want to do their jobs. The expectation is to either execute their plans or create a strategy for Poland to then work on and execute for you. Eventually, you realize you’re not using basic tools or best practices. When you leave (or plan to), you may need to brush up on your skills and remind yourself how a normal company operates.
Pros
Healthcare. Flexible hybrid schedule (flexibility is necessary when you’re expected to meet deadlines while working across time zones with teams entirely in Poland). You get a monthly health & wellness stipend (gym, etc.), which is nice — and may slightly offset the slow erosion of your sanity as you forget how a normal company operates efficiently and professionally.
Cons
They cut budgets, don’t provide basic tools required to do the job (unless we pay for them ourselves), and then roll out Google Workspace in a way that blocks every useful extension — so now we can’t even use apps to help move projects along or meet unrealistic deadlines and goals set by inexperienced, ego-driven leadership who are too afraid to listen to what people actually need to generate revenue. Oh, and that’s before they increase KPIs with zero justification. The company has been on a steep decline since layoffs, including people with actual experience and institutional knowledge who helped grow the US region. Now they’re trying to rehire people to replace them — because that’s obviously a smart and efficient strategy. Everything is in Poland. Everything. Tools, training, support, career growth — and half the meetings happen before the sun comes up. Even if you want to do the job you were hired to do, Poland requires you to outline every step and submit a request for them to create or execute it. If you try to just do the work yourself (basic work), you might get pushback for… doing your job. And don’t expect a meeting to communicate what you need — that won’t happen. Instead, it gets assigned elsewhere, creating “growth opportunities” for someone else. But hey, if you’re Polish and in Poland, at least you get development opportunities — so good for them, I guess. Leadership in Poland seems genuinely frustrated that U.S. teams want to do their jobs. The expectation is to either execute their plans or create a strategy for Poland to then work on and execute for you. Eventually, you realize you’re not using basic tools or best practices. When you leave (or plan to), you may need to brush up on your skills and remind yourself how a normal company operates.