I never heard back after the final interview. I think it's a very poor representation of the company to ghost candidates who spend hours preparing for multiple interviews without an end result whether positive or negative. The interviews were structured as follows: Recruiter Screen: Focused on basics, background, tech stack, availability, salary, and culture fit. Standard screen to confirm you were qualified and when you could start; Interview 1: Tested technical fundamentals fast, Word, track changes, redactions, Ironclad, then opened up about the scope of the role and gauged whether you were genuinely interested in legal ops; Interview 2: Most behavioral and culture focused, wanted a real project walkthrough, how you handle difficulty and conflict; Interview 3: Most technical and process specific, drilled into signature packet volume, redaction workflows step by step, outside counsel invoice management, and accruals forecasting. Testing whether you could actually do the day to day work; and Interview 4: Focused on process improvement ownership, did you actually build and administer Ironclad yourself, drive adoption, handle variables and workflow logic, and how technically comfortable are you with low-code tools and learning new systems. The role is now open again. They might ghost you too or they might have figured out what they want. All the best!