2 rounds of preliminary interviews, to know the candidate, 1 take-home exam with a 24-hour time frame, and 1 full-fledged interview with a technical session to know how the candidate thinks over selected problems. Which I think was too much, because the candidate has already given a take-home exam, thought through a unique set of questions. For me, I did not do well enough in the on-site technical session, because my understanding was they would go over the take home exam. Although, I solved the problems (I admit with a lot of help from interviewers), I think they did not like my thought process.
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
I do not like to disclose the questions, but the introductory interviews were general- aimed to know the background of the candidate. The take-home exam was huge, which required a lot of thinking, and elaborating. The technical session in the full-fledged interview was designed to know how the candidate thinks.
Sent in my resume and was emailed for an interview three days later. The interview was just general questions about academic experience and classes taken. There were some technical questions in which they asked you to define some mathematical/statistical methods. During the interview, since I had no biomedical background, they said that I might be better suited for the Software Engineer position. I passed onto the Software assessment.
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
There weren't any unexpected questions. For the assessment, you should have a good grasp on at least one programming language.
