Fullstack Software Engineer applicants have rated the interview process at Navan with 4 out of 5 (where 5 is the highest level of difficulty) and assessed their interview experience as 50% positive. To compare, the company-average is 38.7% positive. This is according to Glassdoor user ratings.
Candidates applying for Fullstack Software Engineer roles take an average of 14 days to get hired, when considering 2 user submitted interviews for this role. To compare, the hiring process at Navan overall takes an average of 19 days.
Common stages of the interview process at Navan as a Fullstack Software Engineer according to 2 Glassdoor interviews include:
One on one interview: 40%
Skills test: 40%
Phone interview: 20%
Here are the most commonly searched roles for interview reports -
The process took 3 weeks. I interviewed at Navan (Ramat Gan) in Oct 2024
Interview
4 steps, 30 min call, 1 coding, 1 design. 1 hr. it was unpleasnat to make the design in person they are not organized with white board and it made the process nervouse, then the interviewr asked for design that he didn't know about. design googleflights he didn;t know the real engine that you can buy from vendors and show different prices and started to make unclear requirements for the design which led to not being albe to contact correctly the needed task and scope of it. HR didn't notice she makes some political notes while speaking which is not appropriate and very unpleasant and less professioanl in my opinion.
Interview questions [2]
Question 1
coding a pubsub in java multithreaded in coderpad you can look up in google if you need but it is hard. not the everyday easy/meduim leetcode - i would say a hard one.
I applied online. The process took 1 week. I interviewed at Navan (Tel Aviv) in Jun 2024
Interview
I applied to Navan online and got a call back. After a phone screening I had an introductionary interview with the group lead in which he insisted on talking on how much production issues the company has, which led me to form a negative overlook on the position. I gave it another chance and continued to a technical interview in which I was given a task to implement a message broker class in Java. The interview was great but at the end the interviewer described the position as one that will be busy with refactoring old code. Afterwards the recruiter called and told me I passed but I decided to not continue due to the impressions I got from both interviewers
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
Implement a message broker class that receives messages and executes them afterwards